Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25283 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2000 10:39:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by redlabel.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 8 Feb 2000 10:39:08 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12I7vG-0003ry-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 10:31:06 +0000 Received: from apollo.le.ac.uk ([143.210.16.125]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12I7vD-0003rt-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 10:31:03 +0000 Received: from pc171.geog.le.ac.uk ([143.210.25.171] helo=kate) by apollo.le.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12I7v3-0006uo-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 10:30:53 +0000 From: "kate moore" To: "lfgroup" Subject: LF: Weekend new ones Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 10:26:30 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Like everyone, I was most impressed by the 7S6SAJ signal, which read S9+10dB on my meter - almost as strong as Dave G3YXM! I was out most of Saturday afternoon so it took some time to work Christer through the pile-up; eventually having him reply to my own CQ way down the band! He complained about severe RX QRM at that time and seemed to be having difficulty copying most of the many stations who were calling. It will be interesting to see Christer's comments on this - perhaps there was a lot of LF noise being generated on the site, or maybe the receiver couldn't handle the high signal levels from the big antenna, if that was what they were using on receive. We shall see. Despite what some would have us believe, there is an element of luck on LF in getting a site which works consistently well on both receive and transmit. There also seems to be an advantage in having a deaf (or 'deafened') receiver when using a very big antenna....... It was interesting to see Alan's relay of the cluster spot for my QSO with DK7KO. This was another new one for me, but less interesting than the contact I had with HB9DCE at 10.43UT on Sunday morning. He called on my frequency as I finished a contact with DK5PT, and seemed rather surprised when I responded, although his signal peaked RST-559. LX1PD worked him immediately afterwards, but I didn't hear anyone else call him. Is this another case of the mythical assymetrical ear syndrome, or (much more likely) the geographical variations in propagation that many of us are observing on the band? I for one notice this particularly on Swiss, Austrian, South German and North Italian signals, where sometimes I hear them better than other G stations and sometimes worse - an effect with mountains and sky-wave perhaps? (Toni - do you have HB9DCE's address?) Regards John G4GVC near Leicester, IO92JP ** TX: Synth + 400W RF from modified 'G3YXM' Mosfet PA ** ** RX: TS-850S with 3 x CW filters and 0.5ppm TCXO ** ** Ant: Inv-L 60m long, 6m high at feed end, 12m high at far end **