Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11377 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2000 08:57:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by dimple.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 9 Mar 2000 08:57:41 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12SyIs-00001h-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:28:18 +0000 Received: from artemis.le.ac.uk ([143.210.16.126]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12SyIr-00001c-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:28:17 +0000 Received: from pc171.geog.le.ac.uk ([143.210.25.171] helo=kate) by artemis.le.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12SyId-00050G-01 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:28:03 +0000 From: "kate moore" To: "lfgroup" Subject: LF: Speckle patterns / 73kHz activity Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:22:23 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Firstly, many thanks to Markus DF6NM for his fascinating suggestion that the signal variations from stations close to the Alps may be 'speckle patterns' of received strength. This certainly seems a plausible explanation and the figures Markus used are of the right order of magnitude for what is being observed. This is another example of the type of 'research' which is ideally suited to Amateur LF work, where we have a number of keen observers within this group distributed over a large area. It would be interesting if we could gather some more formal data on these signal variations and try to establish whether they do in fact conform to some sort of speckle theory. Secondly, hearty congratulations to all those who have made the excellent recent achievements on 73kHz. I'm really pleased to see the 'old band' getting a much deserved new lease of life before we loose it, especially considering the somewhat greater challenge that 73kHz provides (both in producing a good signal and also in receiving it!). As some of you know, I suffer very badly on receive here, as I can actually see the Rugby antennas from my roof. This had more or less totally discouraged me from putting in the necessary work to get a signal out on the band in the short time we have left. Obviously the progress and experience on 136kHz has been used to great effect, both by the UK stations transmitting and especially by the operators in other countries who now have excellent LF receiving systems - another example of the wonderful co-operative spirit of this group, where the overall results are much greater than those of any individual; something I'm particularly grateful to be part of. With all the fun people are having on 73, I might just be tempted to dust off the NOV [73kHz licence extension] and take another look....... Regards John G4GVC