Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22913 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2002 16:16:23 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 27 Oct 2002 16:16:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 12174 invoked by uid 10001); 27 Oct 2002 17:19:29 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Oct 2002 17:19:29 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 185q0P-0008LR-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:11:13 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.111] (helo=gadolinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 185q0O-0008LI-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:11:12 +0000 Received: from host213-122-67-21.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.67.21] helo=presario-1920) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 185q0O-0001KZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:11:12 +0000 From: "John W Gould" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:15:08 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-reply-to: Subject: LF: RE: RE: RE: Guy ropes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_OUTLOOKversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group My problem is that the attachment is on a Silver Birch tree - if they are the same in the US as here in the UK (probably larger, hi!) that means that they are quite strong but move about a lot - thus the suggestion of a pulley and/or bungee/spring is a good idea. Mal and others (direct to me have suggested marine rope, which also make sense) The winds have reported to have gusted to around 90mph, so not as bad as you experienced Mike. Clearly some mechanical work to do for some of us. 73 John, G3WKL > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of WE0H > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 16:00 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: RE: RE: Guy ropes > > > You guys must have some nasty winds. My LF loop survived 100 mile per hour > winds last summer. > > Mike>WE0H > http://www.we0h.us/lf.html > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Holger 'Geri', > DK8KW > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:50 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: RE: Guy ropes > > Hello LF group, > > earlier today I followed the disussion on guy ropes and found it rather > academic for myself ... half an hour ago the storm has reached us here in > Northern Germany and a gale took my LF vertical down, so I will read again > what you guys have been proposing about guy ropes ... ;-) > Best 73 > > Geri, DK8KW (W1KW) > > > > >