Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: (qmail 22098 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2001 20:57:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225)  by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 31 Jan 2001 20:57:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 29630 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2001 20:59:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70)  by murphys with SMTP; 31 Jan 2001 20:59:55 -0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14O4B8-0006pK-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:48:34 +0000
Received: from [194.73.73.176] (helo=protactinium) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14O4B4-0006pF-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:48:30 +0000
Received: from [213.1.158.119] (helo=presario1920) by protactinium with smtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 14O4Ar-0003XT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:48:17 +0000
From: "John W Gould" <g3wkl@btinternet.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: RE: Bobek Challenge QSO ?
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:49:51 -0000
Message-ID: <LOBBIDNOENMNHIBGDCKBEEOICFAA.g3wkl@btinternet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-reply-to: <3A782B7D.CE47A9BD@bellatlantic.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

and where confirmation of the station contacted and reception of reports is
confirmed in both directions......

John, G3WKL

-----Original Message-----
From: majordom@post.thorcom.com [mailto:majordom@post.thorcom.com]On
Behalf Of Andre' Kesteloot
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 15:13
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Bobek Challenge QSO ?


Walter Blanchard wrote:

> [...]

> And what constitutes a QSO under QRSS conditions?  The exchange of
> information presumably, but what should be the minimum time-lapse  between
> sending and receiving?  Seconds?  Minutes?  Hours?  Days?

IMHO, for the Transatlantic Challenge only, a "QSO" should be a two-way
contact
where both legs take place within a 24 hour period.
73
Andre' N4ICK