Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8328 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2002 21:24:39 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 12 Nov 2002 21:24:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 29751 invoked by uid 10001); 12 Nov 2002 21:26:56 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Nov 2002 21:26:56 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18BiY2-0002KM-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:26:14 +0000 Received: from [213.40.2.14] (helo=gourd.sout.netline.net.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18BiY1-0002KD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:26:13 +0000 Received: from [213.40.210.146] (helo=tcs1) by gourd.sout.netline.net.uk with smtp (Exim 4.04) id 18BiXV-0005dE-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:25:42 +0000 From: "G4WGT" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:25:43 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: Subject: LF: RE: Puzzles Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0tests=HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE,IN_REP_TO,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02, USER_AGENT_OUTLOOKversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Hi all,

I also find the puzzles interesting but I this is not what the LF reflector is meant to be used for.

The future problem could be that in allowing this type of mail maybe other types of mail may be sent therefore detracting from the whole purpose of the LF reflector.

73

Gary G4WGT.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of John W Gould
Sent: 12 November 2002 19:02
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Puzzles

Fine! I personally don't mind as I find them interesting - the question is do the majority of the reflector users mind the scope of the reflector to broaden to include such technical intrigues? I must admit that it is better than spam and helps to keep the brain going between M-Class flares and other discussions more relevant to LF.... I'm happy to change the unwritten scope for the reflector if we don't otherwise have any serious dissenters, so (brief) comments please either way ...

73 John, G3WKL