Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18811 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2003 21:31:15 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 24 Apr 2003 21:31:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 2433 invoked by uid 10001); 24 Apr 2003 21:31:15 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Apr 2003 21:31:15 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 198oIV-0007tm-Gm for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 22:30:27 +0100 Received: from [63.171.43.2] (helo=ns2.genesis-technology.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 198oIQ-0007tU-NA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 22:30:22 +0100 Received: from we0h ([65.165.20.192]) by ns2.genesis-technology.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h3OLUH611316 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:30:17 -0500 From: "WE0H" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:31:25 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-reply-to: Importance: Normal Subject: RE: LF: Re: 136 activity Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.1 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TO,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,ORIGINAL_MESSAGEversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Time for an electric fence up there Laurence. The biggest critter down here that plays with my feedlines and antennas is a squirrel. Mike>WE0H -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Laurence J Howell Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 12:42 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: 136 activity The new aerial height is producing may more weak Loran lines (!) - Ive put up a another Argo screen on the web site for 137. 710 for the test this weekend and continue to visualize DCF39 and 137.7725-137.775 ish - Ive concluded for here that the 870 is producing slightly better results in this location than my 850's. - note Im qualifying this. The sensitivity differences pronounced in specs between the units aren't really applicable/meaningful here on 137Khz given the noise level, but the 870 Noise blanking really does eliminate lines both aurally and visually. Given that on 137Khz Loran spillover peaks S9+ in 100Hz b/w Ive found, like others, I run with better results without AGC, the 870 delving into the noise "better"...... and I dont hear the clatter of Loran either! Is "better" an allowed technical term? A moose got the better of my KLM LPA 8 cm diam boom which was sitting at the 8ft level - He decided to have a pushing match, won, snapped it in two and then trampled on it......obviously not a KLM fan. Have a great weekend Laurence KL1X Anchorage., http://www.kl1x.com