Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92766 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 21:44:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 21:44:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 23460 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 21:44:23 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 21:44:22 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1AorIL-0005yr-Rp for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 21:44:21 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AorHI-00021U-Kp for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 21:43:16 +0000 Received: from [213.40.66.77] (helo=retort.sout.netline.net.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AorHI-0001zX-3B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 21:43:16 +0000 Received: from [213.40.208.4] (helo=taylormade) by retort.sout.netline.net.uk with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AorGn-0002CX-3c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 21:42:45 +0000 From: "G4WGT - Gary" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 21:43:08 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <000001c3ec22$07716120$fce8c593@rsch15> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: RE: G0MRF 300w Tx & DDS VFO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Hello Jim & LF, Thanks for the very useful data Jim, I did in fact get a reply from the organiser of the kit/project & he has stated that several builders have experienced the same low output & have diagnosed a faulty modamp, I have doubly checked for the sort of error you suggest & that seems ok, also there is some gain thro' the ERA-1SM. Now that I have some figures to refer to I can have another look at the signal path etc. From memory I don't believe that I am getting anywere near 250mV p-p from the DDS IC before any amplification takes place. I will let you know. Thanks again Gary - G4WGT -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of James Moritz Sent: 05 February 2004 19:56 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: RE: G0MRF 300w Tx & DDS VFO Dear Gary, LF Group, There should be about 12-13dB of insertion GAIN between the DDS output and the output of the PCB due to the ERA-1SM modamp. Looking at the Analog Devices data sheet, and the schematic component values, the DDS output should be 10mA pk-pk, driving roughly 2 50R loads in parallel, i.e. 250mV pk-pk. The modamp should bring this up to about 1V pk-pk. The DC bias voltage on the modamp output pin should be 3-4V. Is it possible the modamp is in the wrong way round? If it had got turned through 90degrees, the signal would go straight from DDS to output via the 2 ground pins of the modamp. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU