Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36165 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 17:40:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Aug 2004 17:40:07 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BwlWr-0001ZW-C4 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:44:17 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BwlWr-0001ZT-9Z for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:44:17 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BwlSo-000J29-JE for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:40:06 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BwlS9-00056F-ST for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:39:25 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BwlS9-000566-FC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:39:25 +0100 Received: from mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.47]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1BwlS7-0005xL-Jn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:39:25 +0100 Received: from dsl-80-43-6-113.access.uk.tiscali.com ([80.43.6.113]:3025 helo=taylormade) by mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BwlQx-000CEn-LG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:38:11 +0100 From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:39:55 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <25.4bea9731.2e5132a5@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 212.74.114.47 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of tiscali.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_30_40=0.809,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: RE: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: 137 khz acty Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Hi LF Group,

My memories of G9+++ call signs were the ones allocated to companies operating in broadcast television ie. Belling & Lee had the call sign G9AED when carring out live testing of the Band 3 television installation for commercial television on Winter Hill (north west UK), I worked in domestic TV & radio in those days. I also have a QSL card to prove it. HI HI.

Regards

Gary - G4WGT.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of G4gvw@aol.com
Sent: 15 August 2004 22:42
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: 137 khz acty

Oh gaaaawd!

Do we really have to do this?

I once had a G9+++ (and NO it wasn't G9BF of SWM fame) But................SO WHAT !!!

This is AMATEUR RADIO not the Olympic Games!

(There might still be some out there who understand the circumstances under which such calls were issued)