Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1326 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 16:36:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 16:36:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 17016 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 16:35:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 16:35:06 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15c85e-0000aF-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:21:18 +0100 Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.90]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15c85d-0000aA-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:21:18 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from telemetry.demon.co.uk ([194.222.19.114]) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15c84u-000D5O-0W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:20:32 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:58:04 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Tom Boucher" Subject: Re: LF: Receiver In-reply-to: <3B8CCCD4.27810EFB@usa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Version 3.03a Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Talking of TS-850s, does anyone know why my TS-850 changes gain at 500.000 KHz? Seems like an attenuator is switched in above 500 KHz. Is there a mod to defeat it? 73, Tom G3OLB In message <3B8CCCD4.27810EFB@usa.net>, Alberto di Bene writes >Ulrich, > my personal advice is to go for the TS-850. It has a very clean DDS, >which cannot be said for the TS-930, and its sensitivity in the LF band is >second to none, at least among the commercial Ham transceivers. > >73 Alberto I2PHD > > >