Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B273638000097; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:53:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSKrB-0006ou-F9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 04:52:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSKrA-0006ol-Pd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 04:52:16 +0000 Received: from msa-k1.u-netsurf.ne.jp ([202.233.11.14]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <7l1rll@dp.u-netsurf.ne.jp>) id 1TSKr7-0005s0-A6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 04:52:15 +0000 Received: from Vaio3 (d186.HkanagawaFL40.vectant.ne.jp [222.230.70.186]) by msa-k1.u-netsurf.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C7BEB189E9F for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:52:06 +0900 (JST) From: "7L1RLL-Rick" <7l1rll@dp.u-netsurf.ne.jp> To: References: <508C2AC9.3010109@broadpark.no><508C3D68.6020809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1CD1ED7C18E24EF1999E7C47A855EF7D@White> <508C6816.4050804@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:52:07 +0900 Organization: RLL Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <508C6816.4050804@psk31.plus.com> Thread-Index: Ac20l4K7X021uA49Suq3r57M7CGKcQAMBfwQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Eddie, I have a system down during JT9-30 transmitting under Windows XP(SP3) with 1.46GB of RAM. 7L1RLL Rick [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 CTYPE_001C_B CTYPE_001C_B -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 80010ec899558c7eb633db282cbaa403 Subject: RE: LF: JT9: A New Digital Mode for MF and LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01CDB513.6BB8ED60" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410a508cba32537a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CDB513.6BB8ED60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eddie, I have a system down during JT9-30 transmitting under Windows XP(SP3) with 1.46GB of RAM. 7L1RLL Rick =20 _____ =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of g3zjo Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:03 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: JT9: A New Digital Mode for MF and LF =20 Not so here I am afraid, I was hoping to run on 500kHz. 1) On 2 very different computers the TX switching of the COM Port = Latches the TX on permanently, TX STOP puts it back into RX mode but only = closing the software unlatches the COM port. 2) Audio out levels are very high, higher than any other Ham software, I will need an audio attenuator between line out and rig. 3) Program runs under an Admin Account but as a User it crashes after different lengths of time on each computer.=20 Any one else having problems.? Computer O/S is XP. Eddie G3ZJO On 27/10/2012 22:59, Markus Vester wrote:=20 Currently testing JT9-2 on 137420, transmitting during even 2-minute = slots. =20 73, Markus (DF6NM) =20 From: Roger Lapthorn =20 Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 10:26 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: JT9: A New Digital Mode for MF and LF =20 This is exciting news being a 2-way mode, especially as it is 9-FSK, so doesn't need a linear PA. With bandwidths as small as 0.4Hz for the long version, no-one will be complaining about how much bandwidth all this digital stuff takes. Unlike OPERA, the software will be well documented = and open source. There is a danger that, with too many digital modes now available, the activity may be spread too thinly, a point Mal raised some time back I believe Somehow though I suspect JT9 will rapidly become the de-facto digital mode on 472kHz and 136kHz.=20 I hope that one of the internet databases - PSK Reporter I guess, or = perhaps an equivalent to WSPRnet - will be able to display JT9 activity as this = was one of the great bonuses with WSPR beaconing. I may give it a go on 500kHz next week. 73s Roger G3XBM On 27 October 2012 21:00, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: Oh, now Joe has lifted the secret ;-) He released the mode 2 days ago and a first update yesterday. Now it really gets complex which mode to choose. WSPR, Opera, JT9... But as a digital mode for LF i gues JT9-30 is the most promising at all. 73, Stefan/DK7FC --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5357 - Release Date: = 10/27/12 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CDB513.6BB8ED60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi = Eddie,

=A0=A0 I have a = system down during JT9-30 transmitting under Windows XP(SP3) with 1.46GB of = RAM.

7L1RLL = Rick

 =

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of g3zjo
Sent: Sunday, October 28, = 2012 8:03 AM
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: JT9: A = New Digital Mode for MF and LF

 

Not so here I am afraid, I was = hoping to run on 500kHz.

1) On 2 very different computers the TX switching of the COM Port = Latches the TX on permanently, TX STOP puts it back into RX mode but only closing = the software unlatches the COM port.

2) Audio out levels are very high, higher than any other Ham software, I = will need an audio attenuator between line out and rig.

3) Program runs under an Admin Account but as a User it crashes after = different lengths of time on each computer.

Any one else having problems.? Computer O/S is XP.

Eddie G3ZJO

On 27/10/2012 22:59, Markus Vester wrote:

Currently testing JT9-2 on = 137420, transmitting during even 2-minute slots.

 

73, Markus = (DF6NM)

 

Sent: Saturday, = October 27, 2012 10:26 PM

Subject: Re: LF: JT9: = A New Digital Mode for MF and LF

 

This is exciting news being a 2-way mode, especially as it is 9-FSK, so doesn't = need a linear PA. With bandwidths as small as 0.4Hz for the long version, = no-one will be complaining about how much bandwidth all this digital stuff takes. = Unlike OPERA, the software will be well documented and open source.

There is a danger that, with too many digital modes now available, the = activity may be spread too thinly, a point Mal raised some time back I believe = Somehow though I suspect JT9 will rapidly become the de-facto digital mode on = 472kHz and 136kHz.

I hope that one of the internet databases - PSK Reporter I guess, or = perhaps an equivalent to WSPRnet - will be able to display JT9 activity as this was = one of the great bonuses with WSPR beaconing.

I may give it a go on 500kHz next week.

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 27 October 2012 21:00, Stefan = Sch=E4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> = wrote:

Oh, now Joe has lifted the secret ;-)
He released the mode 2 days ago and a first update yesterday.

Now it really gets complex which mode to choose. WSPR, Opera, JT9...
But as a digital mode for LF i gues JT9-30 is the most promising at = all.

73, Stefan/DK7FC




--
 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5357 - Release Date: = 10/27/12

 

------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CDB513.6BB8ED60--