Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Received: (qmail 3124 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 09:55:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by redlabel.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 09:55:41 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12Ljsw-0000fz-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:39:38 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from gatek.vs.dasa.de ([195.243.118.226] helo=gatekeeper.vs.dasa.de) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12Ljsn-0000fs-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:39:30 +0000 Received: by gatekeeper.vs.dasa.de; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id KAA14097; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:40:15 +0100 (MET) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Received: from somewhere by smtpxd X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <F5AFD56E32E8D21191090060974838B1487FA8@ulm003.vs.dasa.de> From: "Koenig, Wolfgang" <Wolfgang.Koenig@vs.dasa.de> To: "'rsgb_lf_group'" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Subject: LF: Inverted V on LF? Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:39:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Hallo Group, I thought about an symetrical antenna for LF. The antenna could be an inverted V arrangement with a length of 2 X150 m. A practicable hight is about 20m for the feeding point. Has anyone experience with this kind of antenna? What is the difference to a marconi system or a top loaded vertical? May be this is a stupide question. Even so.... 73 de dl1san wolf -> will be qrv during the weekend