Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-mp02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0442738000082;
Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:17:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1SNUhA-0005VI-53
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:49:40 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1SNUh9-0005V9-Ky
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:49:39 +0100
Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk)
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>)
id 1SNUh7-0000ah-Id
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:49:38 +0100
Received: from AGB ([2.26.21.82])
by mwinf5d27 with ME
id 2jpT1j00B1mFXqS03jpTmp; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:49:36 +0200
Message-ID: <F5113BE177B54558B8082DD4A462CE58@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <CE6BEA9F709A4B55A925720C011F39CD@AGB> <4F99A446.4080400@o2.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4F99A446.4080400@o2.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:49:27 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120426-0, 26/04/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Ok Peter, Those are the questions asked, the base and removability
, checking up. seems to be a 4 year rule and a 10 year rule , I thought it
was 7 years for no permission being required ? or was that some time ago
? [...]
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Scan-Signature: e43fe7093e9b3ae0dc118eec4efba8a5
Subject: Re: LF: UK Ae mast planning info
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0220_01CD23EE.120DDF20"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1464f99ad425b61
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0220_01CD23EE.120DDF20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok Peter,
Those are the questions asked, the base and removability , checking =
up. seems to be a 4 year rule and a 10 year rule , I thought =
it was 7 years for no permission being required ? or was that =
some time ago ?
Tnx -G..
From: Peter Dodd=20
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:38 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
Subject: Re: LF: UK Ae mast planning info
Hi Graham,
How the mast is fixed into the ground is irrelevant. The planning =
permission is just for the mast. There is no distinction between =
permanent and temporary in the planning laws to my knowledge,
In the past some have tried to circumvent the planning restriction by =
having a portable (mast on trailer) arrangement but I don't think that =
works.
I live in rather a stuffy private estate and I got permission on appeal =
on the grounds that the mast was fold-over and I agreed to only have it =
raised at night. Over the years the people who made all the fuss about =
the antenna have since died and I put it up when I like. Whether this is =
due to indifference or fear that the curse of the radio mast will strike =
again is not known.
Peter, G3LDO
On 26/04/2012 18:53, Graham wrote:=20
Can anyone advise on the planning relevance / requirements to =
these questions , with regards to Ae pole at the bottom of the =
garden
1. Is the secure base moveable or is it concreted into the ground?
2. Can the mast be readily removed from the secure base?
3. If the mast is a permanent structure, has the refurbishment =
resulted in the erection of an entirely new mast,
what is the relevance of the base being concreted into the =
ground ?
I assume the question of detaching the pole from the base is =
one of permanent or temporary structure ?
replacing like with like would not be classed as a new mast ?
Tnx -G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4959 - Release Date: =
04/25/12
------=_NextPart_000_0220_01CD23EE.120DDF20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.19222"></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: =
15px"=20
id=3DMailContainerBody leftMargin=3D0 topMargin=3D0 bgColor=3D#ffffff =
text=3D#000000=20
CanvasTabStop=3D"true" name=3D"Compose message area">
<DIV>Ok Peter,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Those are the questions asked, the base and =
removability , checking up. seems to be a =
4 =20
year rule and a 10 year rule , I =
thought=20
it was 7 years for no permission =
being =20
required ? or was that some time ago ?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Tnx -G..</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style=3D"font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
title=3D"mailto:g3ldo@o2.co.uk CTRL + Click to follow link"=20
href=3D"mailto:g3ldo@o2.co.uk">Peter Dodd</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:38 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Drsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: LF: UK Ae mast planning info</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Hi Graham,<BR>How the mast is fixed into the ground is=20
irrelevant. The planning permission is just for the mast. There is no=20
distinction between permanent and temporary in the planning laws to my=20
knowledge,<BR><BR>In the past some have tried to circumvent the planning =
restriction by having a portable (mast on trailer) arrangement but I =
don't think=20
that works.<BR><BR>I live in rather a stuffy private estate and I got =
permission=20
on appeal on the grounds that the mast was fold-over and I agreed to =
only have=20
it raised at night. Over the years the people who made all the fuss =
about the=20
antenna have since died and I put it up when I like. Whether this is due =
to=20
indifference or fear that the curse of the radio mast will strike again =
is not=20
known.<BR><BR><BR>Peter, G3LDO<BR><BR><BR><BR>On 26/04/2012 18:53, =
Graham wrote:=20
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=3Dmid:CE6BEA9F709A4B55A925720C011F39CD@AGB =
type=3D"cite">
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.19222">
<DIV>Can anyone advise on the planning =
relevance /=20
requirements to these questions , with regards =
to Ae pole at the bottom of the garden</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D136552713-26042012><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>1. =
Is the secure=20
base moveable or is it concreted into the ground?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D136552713-26042012><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>2. =
Can the mast be=20
readily removed from the secure base?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D136552713-26042012><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>3. =
If the mast is=20
a permanent structure, has the refurbishment resulted in the erection =
of an=20
entirely new mast,</FONT></SPAN></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>what is the relevance of the base =
being=20
concreted into the ground ?</DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I assume the question of detaching =
the pole=20
from the base is one of permanent =
or=20
temporary structure ?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>replacing like with like would not =
be=20
classed as a new mast ?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Tnx -G</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<HR SIZE=3D1 noShade>
<P align=3Dleft avgcert=3D"" color=3D"#000000">No virus found in this=20
message.<BR>Checked by AVG - <A href=3D"http://www.avg.com"=20
moz-do-not-send=3D"true">www.avg.com</A><BR>Version: 2012.0.1913 / =
Virus=20
Database: 2411/4959 - Release Date: =
04/25/12</P></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0220_01CD23EE.120DDF20--