Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <EphCkPBGRLVGFwZQ@g3xaq.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:38:14 +0100
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: Alan Ibbetson <alan@g3xaq.demon.co.uk>
References: <003f01c79d31$622811e0$0300a8c0@lark>
In-Reply-To: <003f01c79d31$622811e0$0300a8c0@lark>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.04-S (<7GrEZJe6E9UxKa1s0EQXKvVnX9>)
Subject: Re: LF: 500 propagation
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

G3KEV and G3VTT were their usual strength around 9am (0800Z). Nobody was 
around when I called CQ a few times in the middle of the day. Despite 
heavy QRN this evening, G3VTT was his usual strength over our short path 
distance. Nobody else heard.

Regards,

Alan

In message <003f01c79d31$622811e0$0300a8c0@lark>, Alan Melia 
<alan.melia@btinternet.com> writes
>Hi all, there was a geomagnetic event this morning and whilst small it is
>likely to be extended to tomorrow as well. We have not really had such an
>event yet whilst 500k permits have been active. I would be interested to
>know from regular users and listeners whether the signal levels are enhanced
>over your expectations (particularly around the middle of the day) or as I
>suspect are weaker. 500k is different to 136k where the current conditions
>could boost daytime signals slightly. I also think night-time signals may be
>slightly weaker, similar to 136k.
>
>Thanks and Cheers de Alan G3NYK
>
>
>

-- 

Cheers,

Alan G3XAQ
alan@g3xaq.demon.co.uk