Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp20450igc; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.205.6.7 with SMTP id oi7mr229419bkb.62.1396104180110; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id yp6si4829926bkb.162.2014.03.29.07.42.59 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WTuRh-0000J7-Kx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:41:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WTuRh-0000Iy-8M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:41:17 +0000 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WTuRf-0008HE-Cw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:41:16 +0000 Received: from AGB ([95.145.231.132]) by mwinf5d08 with ME id jShE1n00n2s309303ShEfh; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:41:15 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:41:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks laura We are trying to set the clock rate at pin 4 , to a accurate frequency for 'rf' ( +/- 10 hz ish ) but also would be handy if could be set to audio round 1500 hz Yesterday we found , we could set pin 4 to 3.2 KHz , which , according to the notes , was not supposed to happen [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 4e3b1488273adbbe9757d6bdd5adf219 Subject: Re: Aw: LF: Raspberry PI ,gpio pin 4 clock rate under 32 KHz HOW ? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Thanks laura We are trying to set the clock rate at pin 4 , to a accurate frequency for 'rf' ( +/- 10 hz ish ) but also would be handy if could be set to audio round 1500 hz Yesterday we found , we could set pin 4 to 3.2 KHz , which , according to the notes , was not supposed to happen Tnx fro the link 73-G, -------------------------------------------------- From: "LZ" Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 6:57 PM To: Subject: Aw: LF: Raspberry PI ,gpio pin 4 clock rate under 32 KHz HOW ? > Hi G. > > You wrote: >> Raspberry PI ,gpio pin 4 clock rate under 32 KHz HOW ? > > Pin 4 or GPIO 4, pin 7? > I do not understand what you are aiming for, but anyway, may be this could > help: > http://codeandlife.com/2012/07/03/benchmarking-raspberry-pi-gpio-speed/ > > Laura > > Checked by Anankast(tm), your way to NSA! >