Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.150]) by air-df02.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDF022-5ee74b7485d8371; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:34:00 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dd10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 951D2380002CE; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:33:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Nfhal-0002Mn-1Y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:32:59 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Nfhak-0002Me-JE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:32:58 +0000 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.152]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nfhah-0005kq-0E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:32:58 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3423.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6C7111C0008F for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:32:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3423.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5F42D1C000A9 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:32:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.6.163]) by mwinf3423.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 02FA01C0009F for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:32:48 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20100211223249123.02FA01C0009F@mwinf3423.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <9e6eddd01002110702u6f7c74eel1296a92bbf9405ce@mail.gmail.com> <183213.25085.qm@web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <9afca2641002111422s1d7485d5x535bd82a5c43d6d6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9afca2641002111422s1d7485d5x535bd82a5c43d6d6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:32:38 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100211-0, 11/02/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126 Subject: Re: LF: New NoV Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B6_01CAAB6A.1D9D6DA0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40964b7485d52089 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01CAAB6A.1D9D6DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Its just a case of the que's and cal's : cw is a tech-nique and= wspr is tech-nical still tech ! Personally I think it should of been named ICARUS=20 G ..=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:22 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: New NoV CW good, WSPR good too :-)) 73s Roger G3XBM On 11 February 2010 17:11, M0FMT wrote: Well done Dom Hope to hear you soon. CW Good ......... WSPR BAD!!=20 73 es GL petefmt=20 --- On Thu, 11/2/10, Dominic Baines = wrote: From: Dominic Baines Subject: LF: New NoV=20 To: "rsgb lf group" Date: Thursday, 11 February, 2010, 15:02=20 Hi all, I just RX my SRP/NoV for 501-504kHz. Hope to have my station up and running for TX as soon as pos= sible. Thanks for all those who since 2008 have so far had a cross= band qso perhaps we can manage a qso on 500kHz now. Will focus on CW initially. 72 Dom M1KTA =20 --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 ------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01CAAB6A.1D9D6DA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Its just a case of the  que's an= d cal's =20 :  cw is a  tech-nique&nb= sp; and =20 wspr is tech-nical  still tech !
 
Personally  I think it  sho= uld of been=20 named ICARUS
 
G ..

Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: LF: New NoV

CW good, WSPR good too     :-))
=
73s=20 Roger G3XBM


On 11 February 2010 17:11, M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk&g= t; wrote:
Well done Dom
 
Hope to hear you soon. CW Good  ......... WSPR= =20 BAD!! 

73 es GL petefmt=20


--- On Thu, 11/2/10, Dominic Baines= <dominic.baines@gmail.com>=20 wrote:

From: Dominic Baines <dominic.baines@gmail.com>
Subject: LF:=20 New NoV=20

To: "rsgb lf group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date:=20 Thursday, 11 February, 2010, 15:02=20


Hi all,

I just RX my SRP/NoV for 501-504kHz.
= Hope to=20 have my station up and running for TX as soon as possible.Thanks=20 for all those who since 2008 have so far had a cross band=20 qso
perhaps we can manage a qso on 500kHz now.
Will fo= cus on CW=20 initially.

72

Dom
M1KTA

=



--

http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM
G3XBM= =20    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088


------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01CAAB6A.1D9D6DA0--