Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w16FodVl019463 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:50:41 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ej5Pe-0000VL-4X for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:44:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ej5Pd-0000VC-K5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:44:01 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-4.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.68]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ej5Pa-0006yW-RM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:44:00 +0000 Received: from mal ([2.98.121.32]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id j5PZe8ulhAp17j5PZeMJty; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:43:58 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=talktalk.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=talktalk.net; s=cmr1711; t=1517931838; bh=7VP1BdBfEEDmSr0/ZrnIZZ9i3KOg9bccoLgWxRcZDDM=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=HoI3Jg/I46n9NCIl+hB6Gbee272/PNvgMAkDEsJjubJWpVQOtBc2I2VphM5K67Tj+ sC9P9X7oq9fKbsr+PiWwAB918zoEA2TV6ZMVehYrpWCkYLCvA8lHzdFKiJbSsemsfa ORKsOoV0p9Te9BsAj5yXSriOYWusMtbQY2WxQjCE= X-Originating-IP: [2.98.121.32] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=EsGilWUA c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=6/O84cueCPZQWFRE4vJs9g==:117 a=6/O84cueCPZQWFRE4vJs9g==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=GoqwstHNAAAA:8 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=nN7BH9HXAAAA:8 a=MLcWDinJSi1pTKn6RwQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=aif6eW07jeEVVZOP0pFm:22 a=slCku8JSH3TyizEDQ3pD:22 Message-ID: From: To: References: <8FF570E006AF4FA39E3E7CB4391D5960@mal> <1616b4a4ec5-1e23-1e4d@webjas-vaa046.srv.aolmail.net> <9E8154ADEBB544E1B8CFD4020BC0CA8B@mal> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 15:43:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDhfInqWpL5raeRZlka44ABTQLonHyxTMR87Sl1fDT08vetQEncXwjyCLoqVIV9xLdDfX+RK1T5593mzBOCaV0Zw1rG8zF6gdFQBdnIn3HbBhA8+w2bE ZaI2/1e7aljiYsFZvJ4RoSiiOrdOvLS+m/IdihJRP5fody/zVNV9ZJfk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul Will be active tonight 2300-0200 utc approx JT9 for a possible QSO with you and other NA stns also anyone else that would like to call in. The other night some USA stns active on WSPR were strong enough for QRSS or JT9 QSO'S around 22 dB or less Maybe FR5DH would like to try JT9 or QRSS 10 for a QSO Tnx your input on the subject [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] MF630M BAND (EU<>NA) Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul Will be active tonight 2300-0200 utc approx JT9 for a possible QSO with you and other NA stns also anyone else that would like to call in. The other night some USA stns active on WSPR were strong enough for QRSS or JT9 QSO'S around 22 dB or less Maybe FR5DH would like to try JT9 or QRSS 10 for a QSO Tnx your input on the subject de mal./g3kev/io94sh/Scarborough England -----Original Message----- From: N1BUG Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 3:19 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk ; rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] MF630M BAND (EU<>NA) On 02/06/2018 08:53 AM, g3kevmal@talktalk.net [rsgb_lf_group] wrote: > Maybe tonight ! Join in for the fun. It would be better if more ops had a > bash and give up WSPR for a couple of nights and try JT9 for a change > or even QRSS. I agree ! I am trying to get more ops on both sides of the pond to leave WSPR and try a QSO mode ! I will be there tonight on JT9. At minimum I will CQ for two hours, 2300-0100z, odd/second period. I may go longer as I learned a lesson last night by missing Mal's 0132z CQ ! Whatever info I hear about EU ops planning to be QRV I will pass along to others on this side who are not subscribed here. JT9 works down to about -27, so any time you see stations on WSPR with better reports than that, you should be able to copy them on JT9. 2E0ILY and I have confirmed this on LF. I have installed QRSS 4.08 and verified that it works with my keying interface. I am not quite ready to try a QSO with it but one night later in the week I will try QRSS. 73, Paul N1BUG FN55mf