Return-Path: Received: from rly-md10.mx.aol.com (rly-md10.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.148]) by air-md07.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMD074-92e4af6fa1f18; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:04:48 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md10.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD106-92e4af6fa1f18; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:04:33 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N7BAd-0007Py-46 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:03:19 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N7BAc-0007Pp-Kh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:03:18 +0000 Received: from smtp828.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.13.163]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N7BAa-0005bc-Aw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:03:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 61446 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2009 16:54:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=4V4lKZR9EUThGmHmhNI7p8G89GbtCwE4zdEdXKyL3WRc5eSUyr1yMOOusQE3U7/cHn4eWv9j6ZCpAfR5rhW89G8izyyzrJDpPHEkp4kCgMzYWrlsGQ08ga0DEBnORYvXNKAkaB22dxv16NGWVKUer4pY+wfhMa5/GXx/fY7CBk0= ; Received: from unknown (HELO JimPC) (james.moritz@86.177.107.201 with login) by smtp828.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2009 16:54:57 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: qKIhhNCswBB2TTHr2BORWcGGR2mpopxhCcunGIxpCKQYiG07Q7UOhNo- X-YMail-OSG: SYnZXEkVM1nR8uJtlGipnuzIW3vsiegQTjikVM7ccTXWF_Grvul26efQskgdMFY2IDvdhJJ662daq5AhNfL0cPAY5mO_8LErm7ypGtvnqWIYIXVv8BK_ZReuQo.ApmE1UoSlve9Q67myFfPsI1sHXqgLRKTQGKHgDhzbgEr59b_sHiNDjudY_9Yes4H9CQ1oSt6S9NNnsrLgDV94KlM1OlRDhYndiadptN.r4BhgR851ytYlBfVuMmRIM7PH2QGu5kKuhsbzTXma46J59PR2.IyAt9lodPjL3ij5X8JQDJO9pQ7RKS3.GVjfWUsQ1.GAphlc0A-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: From: "James Moritz" To: References: <001b01ca6086$cd0966b0$0617aac0@jimdesk> In-Reply-To: <001b01ca6086$cd0966b0$0617aac0@jimdesk> Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:54:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: Losses due to ant in tree? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear Jim, LF Group, I did some experiments a while back that compared the efficiency of a top-loaded vertical (inverted L about 10m high and 40m long) in an environment surrounded by trees, compared to the same antenna in the middle of an open field. On 500kHz the antenna surrounded by trees was only about 1/6th as efficient as the field antenna, so trees certainly have a major effect. Part of the effect is due to increased loss resistance - the trees being a lossy dielectric in the capacitor formed by the antenna wire and the ground plane. Also, the radiation resistance is reduced (i.e. less field strength for the same antenna current), which I guess was due to induced RF current flowing in the tree in the opposite direction to the current in the vertical section, partly cancelling radiation from the antenna. It was possible to measure a significant fraction of the total antenna current actually flowing in the tree trunks. On 136k, the difference in efficiency was even greater. So I expect the tree has a significant effect, especially since the wire is actually in contact. For my antenna, the wire was kept at least a few m away from any tree, but it was surrounded by several trees. You will probably find moving the antenna wire away from the tree reduces the loss resistance significantly, and it should also lead to an increase in effective height/radiation resistance. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Cowburn" To: Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 3:19 PM Subject: LF: Losses due to ant in tree? > Hi All, > > > > The vertical 5m section of my inverted L runs up into the branches of a > silver birch tree. The wire goes over a large bough at 5m or so and then > comes out of the branches for some 22m down to a 4m high pole attached to > the garage. > > > > Has anyone a guesstimation of the losses in signal caused by running the > wire through the tree?