DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com;
  h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE;
  b=E4RpExf214PoMIW9TNyWkgF1JuBCLcJTI40K7zmVQDoDA8njBw2pFEVttBBx4H69AuKM7O3VkDNMpX9OAysSgMoWRHlBsqpIdWe/H28BzFjcSka0zGO7FTIIzTWftN357/AQM5mQDWjulHSp5HygIDXpnncX8BNOb7Q+fW69lyE=  ;
Message-ID: <E5478D849A354DA397044B8BB52B1F44@JimPC>
From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <4CA5E86D.1070208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <341539.91487.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <341539.91487.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 19:44:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: Re: looking for a simple-to-build sub-9KHz E-probe
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Dear Daniele, LF Group,

...>It looks
like something I could try to build, even without rebuilding the loop.

Yes, the component values are not very critical - your existing loop should 
have near enough the right inductance to work fine in this circuit. The area 
of my loop is slightly larger, so would give slightly more input signal, but 
in practice the preamp noise is always 10dB or more below the band noise in 
the prototype, so this should not matter.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU