Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp50301igc; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:38:44 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.93.130 with SMTP id cu2mr8781268wib.38.1389479922800; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:38:42 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o7si4116739wiy.16.2014.01.11.14.38.42 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W26Zx-000556-I6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:58:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W26Zx-00054x-4D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:58:53 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W26Zv-0005Si-GX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:58:52 +0000 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.167.244]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4Wwq-1VA6qM0PIS-00yfuY for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:58:50 +0100 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <35FE4D7949D24153B93AD287570B1AA6@Clemens0811> <52CDB98E.2090806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <07DCC8F8EED14FA7A932FF8F90ED27A6@Clemens0811> <52CDD7DE.8080807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <34613E4DA8F14D389A2BCF8A04DDF0DA@Clemens0811> <52D1B87C.80005@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <52D1B87C.80005@freenet.de> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:58:58 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac8PFTS0EWdMzU+lTlSW0gdRyzW4kAAAFGYg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mijC/l1iNDVOKvCAZq2innAKz+uaM8WfyotlxiEVi2Jp/axpzAo 1/323HdhuA8rRYK/XJYLRgahFalm2+n7tbppZIJEnS7UwJEz8sm9HY5Ve3ChCqwPOPF+Xo5 k372qUOwk1pPKPJGYlvOIc5a3iP04hKAIHNIHEZrUHLVofms4AAJ4b05gI7UnpgJl+g/GPq z/Bn75vUr4kBDTv0c29Rg== X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Wolf, you started with solid S7 but later qsb made things a bit more difficult. And I still need some practice to better read plain text. Usual abbreviations are a lot easier... The dipole is a horizontal 90°V, 8-15m high and according to EZNEC it has a spheroidal pattern with no nulls. The vertical part of the feeder is only about 6m long. Tomorrow I'll check the impedance of the antenna aagainst ground with both feeder wires connected and see if I can match it to 50 Ohm,dependent on the available parts. I have also a K9AY for reception here,which is vertically polarized and switchable in four directions (N/S/W/E) . In 99% the dipole always wins hands down when I compare both antennas. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4b5b5ebe37a4c4f430f59bc35c1947b0 Subject: RE: LF: RE: Clemens on MF!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Wolf, you started with solid S7 but later qsb made things a bit more = difficult. And I still need some practice to better read plain text. Usual abbreviations are a lot easier... The dipole is a horizontal 90=B0V, 8-15m high and according to EZNEC it = has a spheroidal pattern with no nulls.=20 The vertical part of the feeder is only about 6m long. Tomorrow I'll check the impedance of the antenna aagainst ground with = both feeder wires connected and see if I can match it to 50 Ohm,dependent on the available parts.=20 I have also a K9AY for reception here,which is vertically polarized and = switchable in four directions (N/S/W/E) . In 99% the dipole always wins hands down when I compare both antennas. Thanks and 73 Clemens DL4RAJ=20 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of wolf_dl4yhf >Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 10:33 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: RE: Clemens on MF!! > >Hi Clemens, > >thanks for the new QSO. An additional quarter-Neper helps a=20 >lot :o), and=20 >I can imagine that my 100 W PEP (which I use when @ home) / 60 m wire=20 >antenna, the signal wasn't so easy to copy. My question was if, for=20 >comparison, you can connect the wires of your dipole so they form a=20 >large top-hat, i.e. a vertical antenna without nulls in some direction. > >All the best and have a nice weekend, > Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD . > >