Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0EE6538000084; Thu, 16 May 2013 17:21:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ud5ae-00020w-Hp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:19:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ud5ae-00020n-2y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:19:56 +0100 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Ud5ac-0005Xr-Cq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:19:54 +0100 Received: from AGB ([95.145.208.129]) by mwinf5d35 with ME id clKW1l0052o30S703lKWvz; Thu, 16 May 2013 23:19:33 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: , <5194AD6A.8835.195E52@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, <5194D116.2010708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5194EE7F.5806.1179AEB@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <5194EE7F.5806.1179AEB@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 22:19:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Who was it? There is a work-round for this problem ! G.. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: bb61bee384896e075004ae5ec954ddd2 Subject: Re: LF: CW 136.8 test Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618651954dc462c6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Who was it? There is a work-round for this problem ! G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Dennison" Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 2:34 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: CW 136.8 test >> There was another station on 137.64 kHz, TXing OP8, yesterday in the >> evening. That signal was well audible as well. Who was it? Maybe >> DF2JP? If so, i didn't know that his signal is so strong. Hopefully he >> is a CW-man (too). > > Stefan, > > Active Op8 stations yesterday were PA0WMR, G8HUH and myself. DF2JP > was monitoring but I did not receive anything from him. > > Mike, G3XDV >