Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 07E2D3800008E; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 08:15:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UOoTt-00034W-O7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:13:57 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UOoTt-00034N-21 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:13:57 +0100 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UOoTq-0004Km-FN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:13:55 +0100 Received: from cpsps-ews20.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.186]) by cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:13:33 +0200 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF101.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.4]) by cpsps-ews20.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:13:32 +0200 Received: from Extensa ([82.170.163.146]) by CPSMTPM-TLF101.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:13:32 +0200 Message-ID: From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 12:13:32 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2013 12:13:32.0523 (UTC) FILETIME=[52560BB0:01CE3389] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Markus, VLF At first I was quite sure, but later in the morning I started to doubt whether I did receive DF6NM. Meanwhile, in the afternoon I really see the trail of DF6NM appear in the spectrogram. As you can see in the traces of DJ8WX (in my grabber) the propagation is not good during daylight between us. I hope you are able to stay on air for a while. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 49da477724dcbe37f1e9a7ff55a3b02e Subject: Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_120B_01CE3389.524CE3F0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d7516163510b35 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_120B_01CE3389.524CE3F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Markus, VLF At first I was quite sure, but later in the morning I started to doubt whether I did receive DF6NM. Meanwhile, in the afternoon I really see the trail of DF6NM appear in the spectrogram. As you can see in the traces of DJ8WX (in my grabber) the propagation is not good during daylight between us. I hope you are able to stay on air for a while. 73s Peter www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ----- Original Message ----- From: Markus Vester To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 9:02 AM Subject: Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz Great, it seems to work! DJ8WX had apparently interrupted his carrier for an hour but has come back. To my surprise, I seem to be making it to Appingedam as well http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber/ http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/ Thanks to Lubos and Peter for monitoring and running your excellent online grabbers, and to Uwe for motivation and company! Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: Lubos OK2BVG Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 8:45 AM To: _RSGB_LF Subject: RE: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz Hello Markus, VLF! I am looking forward to see your signal on my grabber. It would be fine to see both signals, from Uwe and you, together. 73! Lubos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: markusvester@aol.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 21:03:37 +0200 Subject: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz This afternoon I have resonated the venerable seven-bucket VLF coil to my home antenna on 8.27 kHz, and I'm currently running a test transmission on 8270.020 Hz. Assuming appropriate weather conditions (ie no wind and rain, but cold and grey so that the neighbours won't want to enjoy their gardens and complain about the tone), I intend to join Uwe 5 mHz below his carrier, for a couple of hours starting sometime around 8 UT tomorrow. The signal will be weak (10 uW ERP) but I'm hoping to leave a trace in Lubos' grabber window. Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) www.df6nm.de ------=_NextPart_000_120B_01CE3389.524CE3F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Markus, VLF
At=20 first I was quite=20 sure, = but later in the morning I started to doubt = whether I  did = receive DF6NM.
Meanwhile, in the afternoon I really see the=20 trail of DF6NM appear in=20 the spectrogram.
As you=20 can see in the traces of DJ8WX (in my grabber) the propagation is = not good=20 during daylight between us.
I hope=20 you are able to stay on air for a while.
 
73s=20 Peter
 
www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Markus=20 Vester
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 = 9:02=20 AM
Subject: Re: VLF: Sunday = morning test=20 8270.020 Hz

Great,=20 it seems to work! DJ8WX had apparently interrupted his carrier for an hour=20 but has come back. To my surprise, I seem to be making it to = Appingedam as well
 http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber= /
 http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/=
 
Thanks to Lubos and Peter for = monitoring and=20 running your excellent online grabbers, and to Uwe for motivation and=20 company!
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 

From: Lubos = OK2BVG=20
Sent: Sunday, April 07, = 2013 8:45=20 AM
To: _RSGB_LF
Subject: RE: VLF: Sunday = morning=20 test 8270.020 Hz

Hello Markus, = VLF!
I am looking forward to see = your signal=20 on my grabber. It would be fine to see both signals, from  Uwe = and you,=20 together.  

73!

Lubos
From: markusvester@aol.com
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org;=20 rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 21:03:37 +0200
Subject: VLF: = Sunday=20 morning test 8270.020 Hz

This afternoon I have=20 resonated the venerable seven-bucket VLF coil to = my home=20 antenna on 8.27 kHz, and I'm currently running a test = transmission on=20 8270.020 Hz. Assuming appropriate weather conditions (ie no wind = and=20 rain, but cold and grey so that the neighbours won't want to enjoy = their=20 gardens and complain about the tone), I intend to join Uwe 5 = mHz=20 below his carrier, for a couple of hours starting sometime = around 8 UT=20 tomorrow. The signal will be weak (10 uW ERP) but I'm hoping to leave = a trace=20 in Lubos' grabber window.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_120B_01CE3389.524CE3F0--