Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.143]) by air-da09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA092-86194c0b72ea285; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 06:05:30 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id DD4A1380000A8; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 06:05:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OLCia-00076Z-RQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 11:04:36 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OLCia-00076Q-EE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 11:04:36 +0100 Received: from smtp822.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.18]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OLCiY-0002ha-Hd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 11:04:36 +0100 Received: (qmail 96370 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2010 10:04:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=tsCDUmywLZz6FszHW2n++6WqMrDKRooeGroq4PFEYZZgYa7USw5YHQVLbn+nsO4Zbb/QTD2M3KkFc7t0GgwiNeeKj+ofnhXwH6P4gX4nIe3yXPh9lRXRXHOFIIQ4tsh4L/kVAG+vIYXJ2G1iLQAmFy4M2g12YZRWuIQu0tHQzrQ= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1275818668; bh=PFdTSNdxElKp3wxwyl+84LgRgs0Mc0DYFiQpMD3Q+ac=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=hl0L5YMn4BQCnCD1hL99VEs9qxFb+4okH+OQTB4eLsGIRuXTs+B2d+e5j8nWXkUi7LEV/bCWf058wi4XHfHlKJP6DnxVE3FlpNpa7HCoBpvkL/p1LNKcd8+xwDfrg+v9tCHRyB4F4RuoyXBGyqZ8W8YO3oE14fFhxGzuWoBOI54= Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.180.24.201 with login) by smtp822.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Jun 2010 10:04:28 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- X-YMail-OSG: _xUVBM0VM1mN7sv_o2dOb6iw.5gUj2VA0uF3QgZJYupTsmGhYUPxh6rIvmh2EgLfdX4STI5iNSJdLU1NuGGNcn4VzYTtJ8EXX7SxZJTv2QsUvgu4_kpVs.K93gaaR3XWZdJxTPyfL2xzl5G8s.khJRdaWhNlF.gdp8_ncmG2Y20cLw43ElLY1bEJGpDiCCDGH4EVz7.TCT9mDDZGwi_hOXtfo8dcjsqOaES.T3KCPogOBBQktCW0WYbrIuA- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: From: "James Moritz" To: References: <004801cb04d6$e9740b80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <004301cb0544$56965980$0201a8c0@Clemens04> In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 11:04:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18197 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: Re: VLF 9 kcs: preamp and antenna noise Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d269.2 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f4c0b72e809a3 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear Clemens, Markus, Yes, what Markus wrote is exactly what I mean... In general, the SNR does depend on the source impedance. Also, the overall power gain of the preamp/receiver depends on the degree of mis-match at the input, so the fact that the output noise level stays the same in the Perseus does not imply that the SNR will also be the same. But unless the noise figure of the preamp/receiver is quite low, this effect will often be masked by internal noise in practice. As Markus points out, with large RX antennas the source noise power at 9kHz is spectacularly high, and preamp noise is not usually a factor anyway. But for small whips and loops, preamp noise is important. The figures Clemens quotes for the Perseus RX are curious... With 732Hz bandwidth and T = 300K, kTB would be -145.2dBm, so the -118.4dBm noise floor level indicates a noise figure of about 27dB, which seems quite high. The QST review quotes -127dBm noise floor in 2.4kHz bandwidth, which would imply about -132dBm noise floor in 732Hz bandwidth, so some discrepancy there. On a crude practical level, if you listen to your 9kHz RX output and hear mostly crackling QRN, that is fine... if you hear mostly 50Hz buzzing and other man-made noises, you either have a problem with local noise being coupled to the preamp or receiver input, or need a better antenna location... If you hear mainly "white noise", your receive system is probably deaf! Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Vester" To: Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 8:38 AM Subject: LF: Re: VLF 9 kcs: preamp and antenna noise Clemens, I believe what Jim was suggesting is a comparison of preamp noise output with the antenna connected versus a passive load, rather than between different passive load impedances. The intention is to demonstrate that the receiver noise contribution is neglegible against external noise...