Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp44519igc;
        Sun, 9 Mar 2014 04:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.194.243.68 with SMTP id ww4mr14875wjc.58.1394365907774;
        Sun, 09 Mar 2014 04:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w12si317940wiv.65.2014.03.09.04.51.47
        for <daveyxm@virginmedia.com>;
        Sun, 09 Mar 2014 04:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1WMbh3-0003Id-G7
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 11:14:57 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1WMbh3-0003IU-0r
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 11:14:57 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82)
	(envelope-from <cpaul@gmx.net>)
	id 1WMbh1-0000xP-A3
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 11:14:55 +0000
Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.148.52]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with
 ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFPyK-1WPxCk0xka-00ENH1 for
 <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 12:14:54 +0100
From: "Clemens Paul" <cpaul@gmx.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <BLU180-W3599B1565E284475140856AC880@phx.gbl> <2662DF5AA7FA416CBB09CDB90BBFF7B1@White> <016101cf39df$4f4c89a0$ede59ce0$@comcast.net>,<FA723BF050144798AD076EB0C9190D21@White> <BLU180-W432C6E6C028F0DD53D7014AC8B0@phx.gbl> <01dc01cf3a3f$86997bb0$93cc7310$@comcast.net>,<A47BA5540C3B42619C724008CDF3A0ED@White> <BLU180-W23A00B5028E9D0DEEF6B3AC8B0@phx.gbl> <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <025101cf3a52$e0925750$a1b705f0$@comcast.net> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <531A506E.9040103@abelian.org> <531A5C19.9060209@abelian.org> <02ba01cf3aa3$debaad50$9c3007f0$@comcast.net> <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org> <850A470A5B9F4483BED8B49D4791044A@White>,<531B1D0C.3070208@abelian.org> <BLU180-W8538F76198188F2C09234AC8A0@phx.gbl>,<531B4E01.7000304@abelian.org> <BLU180-W331D495C9DCC9299AAAC84AC8A0@phx.gbl> <039f01cf3b72$bfa1db80$3ee59280$@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <039f01cf3b72$bfa1db80$3ee59280$@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 12:14:52 +0100
Message-ID: <DE8A8147B8F04C9CBD67229BD1157A4B@Clemens0811>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AQFwHFQtNP1cuGk4XhlGVCAC9znl2gG7rsFSAR0lnQgBd+LZewJLh/X8Ab8nTT4C/5bZTAGUATieAUzcPSMBZtiUawDaWzx3AoAxwksBwVpScwI72uscAimolEcBOx9H9AFvOCeiAkNoEzYCaGo2mQKz9UH9mnzf1MCAAIKogA==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609
X-Provags-ID:  V03:K0:4ODP2zACQldKFm6KrVhTtfVba0E9p4Bd2ztI3vekEUuGA8eatr9
 7m9VP3ZA4mlm1oqjhGOOE7i8LZSjegTTtlueYgyARbUjnPHiENXRCIlBMQZCyWwAdUuzzmy
 vjEHCUcwgsOOb5svuVVS7oC7qUhBMbduQk2dI/H3dfF2ouBr2Sb6fbU3zcnGSGWYRB8Vn7j
 60kkU8I+as8JOj8Tb3xuA==
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Jim, I use to receive SAQ from Grimeton on 17,2kHz here in
    southern Germany in winter always significantly stronger (I really mean signal
    strength, not SNR) than in summer. Distance is a bit less than 1Mm, path
   is virtually completely over land. Is this a contradiction to the material
    you've presented in your posting? [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [212.227.17.21 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (cpaul[at]gmx.net)
 -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
                             domain
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d
Subject: RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false

Jim,

I use to receive SAQ from Grimeton on 17,2kHz here in southern Germany 
in winter always significantly stronger
(I really mean signal strength, not SNR) than in summer.
Distance is a bit less than 1Mm, path is virtually completely over land.
Is this a contradiction to the material you've presented in your posting?

73
Clemens
DL4RAJ  

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
>[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of hvanesce
>Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 9:37 AM
>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>Subject: RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz