Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: MGTINTERNET: mailn 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v2LBT8ef013685 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:29:10 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cqHum-0005Qx-K8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:25:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cqHum-0005Qo-4y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:25:24 +0000 Received: from rgout0602.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.129] helo=rgout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cqHuj-0004Ga-AO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:25:22 +0000 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.191.197.97 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: c.ashby435@btinternet.com X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50,refid=2.7.2:2017.3.21.104817:17:8.129,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __URI_NO_WWW, __PHISH_SPEAR_REASONS, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __INT_PROD_LOC, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODY_SIZE_4000_4999, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, __MIME_TEXT_P, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (86.191.197.97) by rgout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.13-1) (authenticated as c.ashby435@btinternet.com) id 58BFE0C00164EF7E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:25:20 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1490095521; bh=fAOYP8DaKKw+54LwR5ovMYZaO7fSOXlwpNviAh+aQlY=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=Yt7NterH+PYIFGUwjSqE1i69+kL2zhyRaYx7bO5k+nXnKjP/hxglbdWD+xOouViHcU96fTsFGBhe7sA1O42Ee9zqgZ6nXJFtWVT0Oabl9mnfLNg6dvKFLT+1H+TvBdE3Hmj/hPkqu2jzZH1snz3WmkWxMwivlqeLwMoKh14RWio= Message-ID: From: "Chris" To: References: Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:25:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Scan-Signature: 622b0ca3461797caf37867321c193763 Subject: Re: LF: Re: problems with mails to the list? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10945 Hi Jacek, Strange, if anything I get the opposite problem - I often get the same mail twice!! No idea why. Regarding the list being quieter, I would suggest that's because it has become dominated by mails relating to much lower frequencies of little practical use to most of us. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:17 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: problems with mails to the list? > Thanks Alan, > > Yes i'm aware that many people don't know how smtp works, and that ISPs > break it badly while trying to fight spam (btw this is why i run my smtp > servers, some of the things isps do are totally unacceptable and > uncontrollable by the end user). > > This is why i asked for info from people that are getting bounces, and > that didn't have problems previously but now have them (maybe i didn't > write this clearly enough). The list has been quieter lately. I know of a > user that started to have problems recently, and bounces related to tls > problems (probably related to people being more keen on upgrading openssl > recently). > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Alan Melia wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:13:29 -0000 >> From: Alan Melia >> Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: LF: Re: problems with mails to the list? >> >> Jacek, there are a number of possible reasons why messages do not "seem" >> to go through the mailing list. I write seem in quotes because many do >> not understand the route the messages take. Also I remind that not >> receiving your posting back is not proof it did not arrive or that other >> members did not get it. The situation is massively complicated by the >> various ISP servers apply their own rules to try to reduce spam. Bounces >> are generally not received from this group I believe. And undelivered >> message report is also dumped. One reason is the obvious one of the ease >> of producing a "ping-pong" effect. >> >> There is little problem with UK originated messages though one or two >> even have problems here. The most often reported losses are from non-UK >> originators. In many cases we in the UK see the distribution but the >> originator does not get his posting back. This is aften a function of the >> ISP who it would seem regards messages to the originator are likely to be >> spam. I have several cases of this happening with specific ISPs on Yahoo >> Groups. Some globe-trotting users like Laurence KL7L were unable to post >> from China. We think this was route blacklisting but having no access to >> admin we have no way of confirming. >> >> All I can say is use text (not HTML) which can confuse the parser, keep >> messages and particularly attachments below about 200kB (I can't now >> remember the actual limit....it may be more than this but is certainly >> not exceeding 500kB). >> >> Do not leave the subject line blank if there is an attachment, because >> this trips up the parser. >> >> Make sure you use the exact posting address you subscribed with. I >> believe gmail and googlemail are regarded as the same but they are two >> separate addresses to an ancient list-server like this. If the problem >> continues I suggest re-subscribing with a different address. >> >> Now there have been significant delays reported on several lists in the >> last few days. Yahoo has be delaying occasional messages 3 or 4 days. >> This can be due to congestion during DDoS attacks. >> >> As I said I have no admin access to this server but if the member having >> problems would like to copy me in on postings to the group, I can check >> arrival at least. >> Alan >> G3NYK >> Yahoo Group moderator >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" >> >> To: >> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 10:12 PM >> Subject: LF: problems with mails to the list? >> >> >>> does anyone have problems sending mail to this list? if so could you >>> please send me the bounced message that you got (off list of course)? >>> >>> one of the members of this list wrote me that he has problems having his >>> emails accepted since a few days because of problems negotiating tls (so >>> far we don't know if it's a problem with this list's email servers, or >>> his provider's email servers. both seem to do tls 1.2 without problem). >>> maybe this is the reason why this list has less posts lately (summer >>> propagation on lf/mf might be another reason). >>> >>> btw i have never had any problems with emails bouncing or being delayed, >>> but some people reported it in the past. >>> >>> VY 73 >>> >>> Jacek / SQ5BPF >>> >>> >> >> >