Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: (qmail 53503 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 14:04:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237)
  by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 14 May 2004 14:04:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 34406 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 14:04:00 -0000
X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01)
X-Spam-detection-level: 11
Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217)
  by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 14 May 2004 14:03:58 -0000
Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20])
	 by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BOdI6-0008eZ-HG 
	for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 14 May 2004 15:03:58 +0100
X-Fake-Domain: majordom
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1BOdHQ-0002QU-Bi
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 15:03:16 +0100
Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1BOdHP-0002QL-Ks
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 15:03:15 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.18] (helo=public.thorcom.com)
	by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1BOjpy-0000PL-Lr
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 22:03:22 +0100
Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9])
	by public.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1BOccr-0007cJ-00
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 14:21:21 +0100
X-Fake-Domain: altair
Received: from altair ([147.197.200.45] helo=altair.herts.ac.uk)
	by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1)
	id 1BOcYM-0000I0-00
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 14:16:42 +0100
X-No-DNS-For: 147.197.164.230
Received: from [147.197.164.230] (helo=JamesMorrits)
	by altair.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
	id 1BOcYL-0006R9-00
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 14:16:41 +0100
From: "James Moritz" <J.R.Moritz@herts.ac.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 14:16:36 +0100
Message-ID: <DC9AE469E761D611BD420002A5EC855C7726F4@cerberus.herts.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <DC9AE469E761D611BD420002A5EC855C77224B@cerberus.herts.ac.uk>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: RE: VDC source with microvolt resolution
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes
X-Spam-Rating: 1



>Good. You analysis shows that what remains as a concern is only the 
>noise. Anybody knows of
>an op-amp (readily available) better than the OP27, as far as noise is 
>concerned ? TNX.

>73  Alberto  I2PHD

Dear Alberto, LF Group,

I think Johan's "PWM-ed PWM" is a better idea, since you should be more or
less guaranteed a monotonic Vout vs. input code transfer function for the
DAC. 

I don't think op-amp noise in the filter will be a major problem - the noise
voltage is proportional to sqrt(bandwidth), and the bandwidth is only a
small fraction of a Hz. The high resistor values needed for the filter and
their associated thermal noise mean that an op-amp with a low input noise
voltage is pointless (1Meg has about 130nV/rootHz)- it is more important to
minimize the input current noise, ie. use a FET input device. The active
filter op-amp driving the EFC will have wide-band noise in its output, but
most of this could be filtered out with a simple RC section (say
1kohm/100uF) between the op-amp and the EFC pin.

In some work on an electrometer circuit I did some years back, I found the
newer types of CMOS op-amp, like the LMC660/LMC662 were cheap and good in
this sort of application. Usually, the noise and drift of the op-amp was
less significant than thermal effects, leakage, vibration, cross-talk from
the other parts of the circuit and all sorts of peculiar effects that plague
DC circuits at the uV level.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU