Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F0FAF38000092; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:29:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SeuBC-00042L-Fg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:28:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SeuBB-00042C-TO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:28:37 +0100 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SeuB9-0005oj-9w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:28:36 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.8.23]) by mwinf5d06 with ME id MwUa1j00M0VovFE03wUakN; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:28:34 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <4DF9EFD1.5010208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1313780109.51443.YahooMailNeo@web111907.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <1314394178.5030.YahooMailNeo@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1314641183.5605.YahooMailNeo@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5CBC9A.5020900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1314705226.37125.YahooMailNeo@web111901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5CF192.3040905@legal-medicine.de> <1317076720.22768.YahooMailNeo@web29509.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1317077173.13177.YahooMailNeo@web29509.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1317119515.35504.YahooMailNeo@web29502.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <97A4CD4629F94A90A7F5AFD6E2A17E73@JimPC> <1317287203.84598.YahooMailNeo@web29516.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1339618104.65016.YahooMailNeo@web29503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1339618104.65016.YahooMailNeo@web29503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:28:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120613-0, 13/06/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Well that would appear to be the situation ! 500 signals round 2400 are very good , I think unexpectedly so , but on the other hand , to date the only long term beacon was run by Andy , using the g3plx system , with Gary , running a rx at 240 miles range, , qrss did not really leave any 'history' and the Op beacon system is producing good results with real time s/n measurements , perhaps with the simplified / enhanced user access , ad-hoc beacon nets are providing quite unique data sets ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c8ff00257edaad8e124ab9389da9609a Subject: Re: LF: Best annual period for listening to LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0093_01CD49AB.7C8E2CA0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:451460256:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad34fd8f8285ff6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0093_01CD49AB.7C8E2CA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well that would appear to be the situation ! 500 signals round = 2400 are very good , I think unexpectedly so , but on the other = hand , to date the only long term beacon was run by Andy , using = the g3plx system , with Gary , running a rx at 240 miles range, = , qrss did not really leave any 'history' and the Op beacon system = is producing good results with real time s/n measurements , = perhaps with the simplified / enhanced user access , ad-hoc beacon = nets are providing quite unique data sets ? As to why the path losses are lower in the summer .. over to Alan = on that one ! G. From: Daniele Tincani=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 9:08 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: Best annual period for listening to LF Hello LF, looking at this very interesting graph: http://df3lp.de/misc/hga22/ my understanding is that summer nights - though shorter than winter ones = - could be better for reception of LF signals in terms of signal = strenght. Is this conclusion correct? Thanks 73 D. ------=_NextPart_000_0093_01CD49AB.7C8E2CA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well  that would appear to  be the situation = !   500=20 signals  round  2400  are  very good  , I = think =20 unexpectedly so , but  on the  other  hand , to date = the =20 only  long term  beacon  was  run by Andy  , = using=20 the  g3plx  system , with  Gary , running a  = rx =20 at  240 miles  range,   ,  qrss did  not  = really=20 leave any  'history'  and the Op  beacon system is=20 producing  good  results with  real  time =20 s/n   measurements , perhaps  with = the simplified /=20 enhanced  user access , ad-hoc  beacon  nets  = are =20 providing quite unique data  sets ?
 
As  to  why  the  path losses are lower in = the =20 summer  .. over to  Alan  on that  one  !
 
G.

Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 9:08 PM
Subject: LF: Best annual period for listening to=20 LF

 
Hello LF,
 
looking at this very interesting graph:
 
http://df3lp.de/misc/hga22/
 
my understanding is that summer nights - though shorter than winter = ones -=20 could be better for reception of LF signals in terms of signal strenght. = Is this=20 conclusion correct?
 
Thanks
73
D.
 
------=_NextPart_000_0093_01CD49AB.7C8E2CA0--