Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8D38D380000B8; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 05:18:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UIy5O-0000rk-4T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:16:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UIy5N-0000rb-82 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:16:29 +0000 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UIy5L-0008Nz-2f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:16:28 +0000 Received: from cpsps-ews11.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.178]) by cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:16:06 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.5]) by cpsps-ews11.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:16:06 +0100 Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:16:05 +0100 Message-ID: From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: <62fc65b613494309a1b2b0d0f45500db@kabelmail.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:16:02 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Mar 2013 09:16:05.0654 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1B2C360:01CE26DD] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Uwe, Looks stable and very strong over the night. That step in my 238 uHz window is because DHO went QRT for 1h. I use DHO 23.4 KHz experimental as reference in only this 238 uHz window. At 09h UTC today I did switch back to 22k1 as reference for Specrum Lab. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 14e68a9cb6dee915a96310ea9bf261c5 Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_11C7_01CE26DD.E1821670" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cd514c21cd52db X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_11C7_01CE26DD.E1821670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Uwe, Looks stable and very strong over the night. That step in my 238 uHz window is because DHO went QRT for 1h. I use DHO 23.4 KHz experimental as reference in only this 238 uHz window. At 09h UTC today I did switch back to 22k1 as reference for Specrum Lab. At 06h30 was your signal very strong today. The cursor say's -116dB at that moment. Where do I read the noise floor in Spectrum Lab ? Average of the Yellow grab ? In that case Noise is -140dB Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ----- Original Message ----- From: PA1SDB, Peter To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:24 PM Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) Hi Uwe, Between ~11 and ~16 h UTC today was stabillity perfect. Befor 11 was a short break and also after 16 h Not sure how it is right now. The new traces are building slowly and the picture is not complete yet. 73's, Peter. PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ----- Original Message ----- From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:23 PM Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) Hi Peter and Eddie, thanks for the hint. GL Uwe/dj8wx ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 20.03.2013 11:07 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Peter / Uwe Maybe that explains why when I ran my my Grabber yesterday I could detect nothing. I haven't been running any 8.9KHz for a while as my WSPR on 474KHz makes a mess. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 20/03/2013 06:28, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: Hello Uwe, Your signal is not very stable now. www.qsl.net/pa1sdb It feels not good to me to complain about 0.001 Hz drift, but I hope you understand when you take a look at my grabber ;-) Thanks anyway for all the experimental broadcast's. Best 73's, Peter - PA1SDB ------=_NextPart_000_11C7_01CE26DD.E1821670 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Uwe,
Looks stable and very strong over the=20 night.
That step in my 238 uHz window is because DHO = went QRT=20 for 1h.
I use DHO 23.4 KHz experimental as reference = in only=20 this 238 uHz window.
At 09h UTC today I did switch back to 22k1 as = reference=20 for Specrum Lab.
 
At 06h30 was your signal very strong = today.
The cursor say's -116dB at that=20 moment.
 
Where do I read the noise floor in = Spectrum Lab=20 ?
Average of the Yellow grab ?
In that case Noise is -140dB
 
Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB
www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 PA1SDB, = Peter=20
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 = 9:24=20 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very = stable now=20 at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz)

Hi Uwe,
Between ~11 and ~16 h UTC today was = stabillity=20 perfect.
Befor 11 was a short break and also after 16 = h
Not sure how it is right now.
The new traces are building slowly and the = picture is=20 not complete yet.
 
73's, Peter.
 
PA1SDB
www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de =
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, = 2013 2:23=20 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very = stable=20 now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz)

Hi=20 Peter and Eddie,

thanks for the = hint.

GL
Uwe/dj8wx
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet:=20 20.03.2013 11:07
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff:=20 Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz)

Hi Peter / Uwe

Maybe that explains why when I ran my my = Grabber=20 yesterday I could detect nothing. I haven't been running any 8.9KHz = for a=20 while as my WSPR on 474KHz makes a mess.

73 Eddie = G3ZJO

On=20 20/03/2013 06:28, PA1SDB, Peter wrote:=20
Hello Uwe,
Your signal is not very = stable=20 now.
 
www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
 
It feels not good to me = to=20 complain about 0.001 Hz drift, but I hope you understand when = you=20 take a look at my grabber ;-)
 
Thanks anyway for = all the=20 experimental broadcast's.
 
3D""=20
 
 
Best 73's, Peter -=20 PA1SDB 
 
 
=
 

= ------=_NextPart_000_11C7_01CE26DD.E1821670--