Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w9EGRcK7022353 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:27:46 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gBjAO-0007DY-Fz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:22:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gBjAN-0007DP-Tq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:22:55 +0100 Received: from rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.178]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gBjAL-0007wD-CU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:22:54 +0100 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.163.129.78 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-SNCR-VADESECURE: CLEAN X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedrvdehgddutdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkffhvffuffggtgfgrfgioffqsehtjeejtddutddunecuhfhrohhmpedftehlrghnucfovghlihgrfdcuoegrlhgrnhdrmhgvlhhirgessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepkeeirdduieefrdduvdelrdejkeenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghlohepghhnrghtpdhinhgvthepkeeirdduieefrdduvdelrdejkedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeorghlrghnrdhmvghlihgrsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehrshhgsggplhhfpghgrhhouhhpsegslhgrtghkshhhvggvphdrohhrgheqnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd Received: from gnat (86.163.129.78) by rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.26-1) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5B321EA009F1ADA2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:22:52 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1539534173; bh=CZHdYmbg/JTIydbaVH7gTl3lEniFYB2VCKOpGRro9n4=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=SSISGsyRc0SRcyBREKYHgfzMcsenvjr2D6qnhesCFo/XITTN8abLVKwcy0a3K2SseGnqzODEA3VdEq0091RVCQBm/EAxQqLvs81PXt4It3rGBouVwZuGKrDEEEqmzy2NiB06y3vLlus7wdS21t+9FdWMz5MbmCFyJA5y8Ve1vFI= Message-ID: From: "Alan Melia" To: Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:22:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello all I am considering transering the Yahoo Group to groups.io. which has none of the problems that yahoo has built into their system and many radio groups have transfered, I am wondering if this move would encourage those who objected to moving to Yahoo initially would join us and benefit from the archive that will build there. I would like to revert to the situation where we operate just one LF Group. The blacksheep server is very old now and whilst it has been almost miraculously reliable, this may not necessarily continue. Even so some have found it difficult to join and some are unable to post. [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.20.0.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.9 STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES No description available. 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: LF: leaving Yahoo?? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello all I am considering transering the Yahoo Group to groups.io. which has none of the problems that yahoo has built into their system and many radio groups have transfered, I am wondering if this move would encourage those who objected to moving to Yahoo initially would join us and benefit from the archive that will build there. I would like to revert to the situation where we operate just one LF Group. The blacksheep server is very old now and whilst it has been almost miraculously reliable, this may not necessarily continue. Even so some have found it difficult to join and some are unable to post. The advantage to the ''adninistrators'' would be to gain control and have a server that has responsive support unlike Yahoo. Groups.io also has the facility to set up sub groups so that VLF could for instance be in a subgroup, likewise wspr, EbNaut, Opera, if required. >From he Yahoo group we lose the necessity of having a Yahoo email address to access the web site, and the adverts that get in the way. And the occasional bursts of duplicate messages and delayed posts. Please respond to me if you would NOT want to join groups.io Alan G3NYK