Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E76F938000088; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:22:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UpOs1-0007bV-Fy for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UpOs0-0007bH-SW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:44 +0100 Received: from impaqm4.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.20] helo=telefonica.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UpOry-00077W-Tp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:43 +0100 Received: from IMPmailhost1.adm.correo ([10.20.102.38]) by IMPaqm4.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id qKtn1l00r0piX6q3QLLhix; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:20:41 +0200 Received: from p1800 ([217.127.130.21]) by IMPmailhost1.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id qLLg1l00L0Tqill1hLLhp1; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:20:41 +0200 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=zOX8PX37S+M3vhHtptL+MYffHY/XwYKfV8nMfa4ElFM= c=1 sm=1 a=VY-2JVJxNB4A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ByuOfJntlSSwhBEClM/PYg==:17 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=WYd5oxahAAAA:8 a=7xezkvRsvxnTSNrtaCAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=_RhRFcbxBZMA:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=SIgZ-KYG32UA:10 a=ByuOfJntlSSwhBEClM/PYg==:117 X-original-sender: 943452288234280@telefonica.net Message-ID: From: "Federico" To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:20:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 213.4.138.20 (impaqm4.telefonica.net) used invalid HELO/EHLO telefonica.net - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK. My habitual QRT time is 20 GMT, but today I CQ at 21 GMT in 472,2 khz Hpe cuagn dr OM. Federico EA2HB [...] Content analysis details: (-1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [213.4.138.20 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ea2hb[at]telefonica.net) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 6ffbd2c9950b634d6cc91f9565b01a8b Subject: Re: LF: 630m Spain Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d51c212ff3251 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none OK. My habitual QRT time is 20 GMT, but today I CQ at 21 GMT in 472,2 khz Hpe cuagn dr OM. Federico EA2HB ----- Original Message ----- From: "C. Groeger" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 8:54 PM Subject: Re: LF: 630m Spain > Hi Frederico, > I would like to try QSO. > But I think later in the evening would be better. > Is 21.00 GMT possible for you? > 73, df5qg > > Christian Groeger > > Federico schrieb: > >>I've been three weeks calling CQ on the frequency of 472.5 kHz between 17 >>and 17.30 UTC >>and listening to the band at different times of day without result. >>Keep calling CQ between 17 and 17.30. I would appreciate even if negative >>controls. >>My signals at 20 km are strong and clean. >>A possible correspondent at 80 km, is fighting a strong local QRM. >>My signal does not activate the RX of Twente. >>My power is close to the maximum allowed. >>Federico EA2HB