Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B6D2238000091; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:25:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SjS0q-0004BU-Iu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:24:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SjS0p-0004BL-Vb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:24:43 +0100 Received: from service135.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.78]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SjS0n-00020r-CB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:24:42 +0100 Received: from rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk (salt-ext.roke.co.uk [109.207.29.2]) by service135.mimecast.com; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:24:39 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Disposition-Notification-To: "Gannaway, Julian" Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:24:39 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Blacksheep and Yahoo Thread-Index: Ac1QjfnhBMldWTj/S6eRPhJfbWqcvgC7vIlQ References: From: "Gannaway, Julian" To: X-MC-Unique: 112062610243902901 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: As an interested reader of the reflector, option (a) seems a good compromise... Julian, G3YGF [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [91.220.42.78 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 4ad75ad27eb9a353f40105f6e3872b5c Subject: LF: RE: Blacksheep and Yahoo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD537D.82A8887D" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 1:2:398169056:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 1 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605a4fe980210055 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CD537D.82A8887D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As an interested reader of the reflector, option (a) seems a good compromise... Julian, G3YGF =20 =20 ________________________________ From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Roger Lapthorn Sent: 22 June 2012 16:43 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk Subject: LF: Blacksheep and Yahoo =20 Just wondering how people think the current set-up is working? The recent poll suggested a large majority would be happy with a full migration to Yahoo, but we seem to now have a very messy split with postings in either place or both. Personally I think we need to either:=20 (a) Keep day-to-day posts on Blacksheep and use the Yahoo group just as an LF/MF/VLF archiving facility where links, schematics, pictures and screenshots etc can be kept for the long-term i.e. not post day-to-day sked type messages on Yahoo. or (b) Fully migrate to Yahoo and close the Blacksheep reflector.=20 We all want the best way of communicating LF/MF/VLF news and information and we also want the ability to archive important and helpful data for newcomers and history. As long as this is achieved most of us don't mind how.=20 I proposed a full move to a Yahoo group as it allows both quick email type messaging and archiving. IMHO this is still the better option, but it is not my place to dictate what experienced LFers prefer.=20 Constructive and helpful comments please. 73s Roger G3XBM --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ --=20 Queen's Award for Enterprise and Innovation 2011 Roke Manor Research Ltd Romsey, Hampshire, SO51 0ZN, United Kingdom http://www.roke.co.uk Part of the Chemring Group Registered in England & Wales at: Chemring Group PLC, Chemring House, 1500 Parkway, Whiteley, Fareham, Hampshire PO15 7AF, ENGLAND.=20 Registered No: 267550 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is proprietary to Roke Manor Research Ltd and must not be passed to any third party without permission. This communication is for information only and shall not create or change any contractual relationship. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please consider the environment before printing this email ------_=_NextPart_001_01CD537D.82A8887D Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20

As an interested reader of the reflect= or, option (a) seems a good compromise...

Julian, G3YGF=

 

 

From:= owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.o= rg] On Behalf Of Roger Lapthorn
Sent: 22 June 2012 16:43
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep= .org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
Subject: LF: Blacksheep and = Yahoo

 

Just wondering ho= w people think the current set-up is working? The recent poll suggested a large majo= rity would be happy with a full migration to Yahoo, but we seem to now have a ve= ry messy split with postings in either place or both.

Personally I think we need to either:

(a) Keep day-to-day posts on Blacksheep and use the Yahoo group just= as an LF/MF/VLF archiving facility where links, schematics, pictures and screenshots etc can be kept for the long-term i.e. not post day-to-d= ay sked type messages on Yahoo.

or

(b) Fully migrate to Yahoo and close the Blacksheep reflector.

We all want the best way of communicating LF/MF/VLF news and information an= d we also want the ability to archive important and helpful data for newcomers a= nd history. As long as this is achieved most of us don't mind how.

I proposed a full move to a Yahoo group as it allows both quick email type messaging and archiving. IMHO this is still the better option, but it is no= t my place to dictate what experienced LFers prefer.

Constructive and helpful comments please.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.= blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https:= //sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspo= t.com/



--

Queen's = Award for Enterprise and Innovation 2011

Roke Manor Research= Ltd
Romsey, Hampshire, SO51 0ZN, United Kingdom
http://www.roke.co.uk

Part of the Chemrin= g Group
Registered in England & Wales at:
Chemring Group PLC,= Chemring House, 1500 Parkway,
Whiteley, Fareham, Hampshire PO15 7AF, = England.
Registered No: 267550

The information con= tained in this e-mail and any attachments is
proprietary to Roke Manor= Research Ltd and must not be passed to any
third party without permis= sion. This communication is for information
only and shall not create = or change any contractual relationship.

Please consider the= environment before printing this email

------_=_NextPart_001_01CD537D.82A8887D--