Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B3472380000B3; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:27:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Usi3i-0007QG-Vg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:26:30 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Usi3i-0007Q7-FA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:26:30 +0100 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Usi3g-0000xp-3a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:26:29 +0100 Received: from AGB ([95.145.211.133]) by mwinf5d50 with ME id tzSS1l00F2tEcPz03zSSea; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 01:26:27 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <003d01ce71b1$fc0c55e0$f42501a0$@comcast.net>, , <51CD86E7.7414.B3CCDE@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:26:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: At 90 watts , RN7T , decoding into UK at the moment , improved east-west over the last week ? On the s/n front , Op or wspr is giving a path quality indication , which takes into account ,rx conditions , local urban noise unfortunately can vary considerably , at my qth , it can make over 10 dB difference to the decode s/n , or stop it all together [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b16f5c37bc0c21b41453c2ac5e65973c Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Op32 137.555 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0146_01CE745F.4AC9FE30" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618651ce1be7311f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0146_01CE745F.4AC9FE30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 90 watts , RN7T , decoding into UK at the moment , improved = east-west over the last week ? On the s/n front , Op or wspr is giving a path quality indication = , which takes into account ,rx conditions , local urban noise = unfortunately can vary considerably , at my qth , it can make = over 10 dB difference to the decode s/n , or stop it all = together =20 In a fixed system the audio level indication , would be a = measurement of wide band noise in the 2.5k pass band , that may be = a route ? 73 -G. R7NT G3XDV 2200m OPERA 2837 kms 22:08:07=20 R7NT DF6NM 2200m OPERA 2060 kms 22:08:08=20 SV8CS DF6NM 2200m OPERA 1506 kms 21:32:32=20 G3XDV DF6NM 2200m OPERA 842 kms 23:04:27=20 G8HUH G3XDV 2200m OPERA 199 kms 22:20:47=20 G3XDV G8HUH 2200m OPERA 199 kms 21:46:29=20 G3XDV G0KTN 2200m OPERA 158 kms 21:46:29=20 G8HUH G0KTN 2200m OPERA 41 kms 22:20:46=20 -------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 11:45 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Op32 137.555 kHz=20 >=20 > Hi Markus and Mike, >=20 > Thank-you for the reports and the favourable comments on my photons. > I hope to try some antenna comparisons soon. Thanks for reminding > me that the dB values are S/N, Mike. Perhaps an ensemble of = measurements > can be used to get a mean value of noise. It is still quite light at > the moment (2245) utc and the TX has just about start OP32 again. >=20 > 73 > Joe >=20 > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions = at > = http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.p= hp > ------=_NextPart_000_0146_01CE745F.4AC9FE30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
At 90 watts  , RN7T , decoding  into  UK at = the =20 moment  , improved   east-west  over the  = last =20 week ?

On the  s/n front ,  Op or  wspr  is=20 giving  a  path  quality indication  , which  = takes=20 into  account  ,rx  conditions , local urban noise=20 unfortunately  can vary  considerably  , at  = my =20 qth  , it can make  over  10 dB difference to the =20 decode  s/n  , or  stop  it  all  together =  
 
In a fixed  system the  audio  level = indication  ,=20 would be a measurement  of  wide band  noise in the  = 2.5k=20 pass  band , that  may be a  route ?
 
73 -G.

22:20:46
R7NT G3XDV 2200m OPERA 2837 kms 22:08:07
R7NT DF6NM 2200m OPERA 2060 kms 22:08:08
SV8CS DF6NM 2200m OPERA 1506 kms 21:32:32
G3XDV DF6NM 2200m OPERA 842 kms 23:04:27
G8HUH G3XDV 2200m OPERA 199 kms 22:20:47
G3XDV G8HUH 2200m OPERA 199 kms 21:46:29
G3XDV G0KTN 2200m OPERA 158 kms 21:46:29
G8HUH G0KTN 2200m OPERA 41 kms


<= BR>






------------------------------------------= --------
From:=20 <jcraig@mun.ca>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 11:45 PM
To:=20 <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Op32 = 137.555 kHz=20

>
> Hi Markus and Mike,
>
> Thank-you for = the=20 reports and the favourable comments on my photons.
> I hope to try = some=20 antenna comparisons soon.  Thanks for reminding
> me that the = dB=20 values are S/N, Mike.  Perhaps an ensemble of measurements
> = can be=20 used to get a mean value of noise.  It is still quite light = at
> the=20 moment (2245) utc and the TX has just about start OP32 again.
> =
>=20 73
> Joe
>
> This electronic communication is = governed by the=20 terms and conditions at
>=20 http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.p= hp
>
------=_NextPart_000_0146_01CE745F.4AC9FE30--