Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.124.97 with SMTP id mh1csp59860igb; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:09:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.42.129 with SMTP id u1mr13467497eev.116.1371416977282; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a42si9974790eeb.161.2013.06.16.14.09.36 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UoJte-0000g0-0Y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:49:58 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UoJtd-0000fp-Hd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:49:57 +0100 Received: from omr-d06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.203]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UoJtb-0003M7-AC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:49:56 +0100 Received: from mtaout-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.133]) by omr-d06.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 7D3257000008A; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:49:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from White (188-195-246-26-dynip.superkabel.de [188.195.246.26]) by mtaout-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 90CCCE0000A2; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: From: "Markus Vester" To: , Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:49:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1371415793; bh=f/jxGKGCtoni4VkIGKVk/4y67av3l7BHoHdZeBSW5e4=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vVxRe8uugmfcSsE1PvitDRToIr/DAy+puAzvpT846I2glyI6AnHxr1Mj4jey1wPTk Gyt7ndfZ0wq/8LNtSTY5TPQ2TcJZUoz+3YhovDb0LoT8mQyBzIeFgg73jrbXVCvis6 mpYDvVA1kaK2qcJZ+Xf/YqJPksYv1aV5J9+CjPO0= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:364984384:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338551be24ee1e2a X-AOL-IP: 188.195.246.26 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: John, thanks again. Your powerline QRM situation seems reminiscent of that at VE7TIL, which at the time has influenced the frequency choice for the current Eu slot. If 136.17 should become particularly nasty we might have to reconsider, but I'd suggest not before the season is quiet enough to allow in-depth monitoring. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.109.203 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c40596c1cc3306f1877076595a921c57 Subject: LF: RE: DK7FC and DF6NM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01CE6AE3.CDC6C780" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 746 Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CE6AE3.CDC6C780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John, thanks again. Your powerline QRM situation seems reminiscent of = that at VE7TIL, which at the time has influenced the frequency choice = for the current Eu slot. If 136.17 should become particularly nasty we = might have to reconsider, but I'd suggest not before the season is quiet = enough to allow in-depth monitoring. We seem to be lucky in that LF powerline QRM has hardly been an issue = here in Europe. The one threat which worries me most is a proposed = inductive e-car charging system: 3 kW real power, with load-dependent = variable frequency around 140 kHz. A couple of those nearby and you're = deaf 'n' blind... Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) =20 RE: [rsgb_lf_group] DK7FC and DF6NM=20 http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/message/3180 Markus, I don't have much to show from last night's run, but here it is: http://www.w1tag.com/temp/FC16JUN13.jpg I'm at our Maine QTH, once a very nice receiving location. But with the = advent of "smart meters" on the power lines, and some of the other = benefits from modern technology, the niceness has gone away. In = particular, there is a loud, stable carrier (part of a cluster of four) = at 136.100 that is very annoying. The single phase HV line running = through our property is an efficient radiator of all this. John, W1TAG=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CE6AE3.CDC6C780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
John, thanks again. Your powerline QRM = situation=20 seems reminiscent of that at VE7TIL, which at the time has influenced = the=20 frequency choice for the current Eu slot. If 136.17 should become = particularly nasty we might have to = reconsider, but I'd=20 suggest not before the season is quiet enough to allow in-depth=20 monitoring.
 
We seem to be lucky in that LF = powerline QRM has=20 hardly been an issue here in Europe. The one threat which worries me = most=20 is a proposed inductive e-car charging system: 3 kW real = power, with=20 load-dependent variable frequency around 140 kHz. A couple of those = nearby and=20 you're deaf 'n' blind...
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
 
  
RE: [rsgb_lf_group] DK7FC and DF6NM
http= ://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/message/3180
<= BR>
Markus,
I don't have much to show from last night's run, but = here it=20 is:
http://www.w1tag.com/temp/FC16JUN13.jpg
<= FONT=20 face=3DVerdana color=3D#000000 size=3D2 KERNING=3D"0" = LETTERSPACING=3D"0">
I'm at our Maine  QTH, once a very nice = receiving=20 location. But with the advent of "smart meters" on the power lines, and = some of=20 the other benefits from modern technology, the niceness has gone = away.  In=20 particular, there is a loud, stable carrier (part of a cluster of four) = at=20 136.100 that is very annoying. The single phase HV line running through = our=20 property is an efficient radiator of all this.
John, W1TAG

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CE6AE3.CDC6C780--