Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1481; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id uA29keh7021909 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:46:40 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1c1s3k-0001mD-Nv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:42:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1c1s3k-0001m4-8U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:42:16 +0000 Received: from rgout0202.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.201] helo=rgout02.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c1s3g-0006xv-IP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:42:15 +0000 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.186.175.50 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: c.ashby435@btinternet.com X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50,refid=2.7.2:2016.10.25.164217:17:8.707,ip=,rules=NO_URI_FOUND, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND, NO_MESSAGE_ID, TO_MALFORMED, NO_URI_HTTPS Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (86.186.175.50) by rgout02.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.07.01-1) (authenticated as c.ashby435@btinternet.com) id 57F4D2C7060775DB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:42:10 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1478079732; bh=z5bLTquSK7Js/xxZOQcM2Kc7Xbs3bagG0M8C6S6//Hw=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=tXepdNprHCv9+Z46ukf5H+fxHcEE00THOk0xC7tnYqkxqsttg8mGsJp9QF3DLtApokq08aOBoGnLtMh9susBsYAaZ52+9rGvaZyvWWRmzOaC/qpXUY05qtgexhF3osqX9QKe2x3RxTf+v04PCd3SfF1eMiC0jwuZDdFoQc26vi8= Message-ID: From: "Chris" To: References: Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:42:10 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: LF: Re: SWR Bridges Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9343 Hi Steve, I found a lack of sensitivity with my 1.8 - 160MHz Welz SWR/PWR meter on 630m, so not much good for a few watts, probably OK with high power. I found the best solution was to build one. Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 8:52 PM Subject: LF: SWR Bridges > Has anyone here had experience using (or attempting to use) an HF SWR > bridge on 630m and if so, what did you find out? > > > Thanks, > > Steve > > > WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://members.shaw.ca/ve7sl > > VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to > Nanowaves": http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/ >