Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.66.221.10 with SMTP id qa10csp66369pac; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:16:51 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.71.116 with SMTP id t20mr2787401wju.51.1392239810762; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:16:50 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ck6si2381722wib.74.2014.02.12.13.16.49 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@btinternet.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WDgjl-0001n6-Dh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:48:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WDgjk-0001mx-Us for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:48:52 +0000 Received: from smtpout13.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.133]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WDgjj-0003P4-87 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:48:51 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090204.52FBDE31.017D,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/97,refid=2.7.2:2014.2.12.164215:17:8.510,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __HAS_HTML, HTML_NO_HTTP, BODY_SIZE_4000_4999, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, __STYLE_RATWARE_NEG, __URI_NS, HTML_50_70, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (109.157.10.86) by smtpout13.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.99.10223) (authenticated as c.ashby435@btinternet.com) id 52F0289600954051 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:48:49 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1392238131; bh=rhzPQx3ibPPfB/+lsHtlZiUao/fyToVK5Eci43akzJI=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer; b=TwZUQJCCCETm+1Dy3+SC2qlmtnj3LliHQIeletHSUv1aAOIFY316TowZWzIRQqkLXow6Edvucv4PkEqCRNZ0vidA1WZnj+nEial/fJP/tUimdBor8PI0jBvc5dEJnB6GjQtyGUkDwExyQvVI37/Uxe5sahaaJpKvJGjsNT/J9Ok= Message-ID: From: "Chris" To: References: <89DADEA5A2EE4F52900427FF9563DD31@IBM7FFA209F07C> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FCE5E13@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:48:47 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks to all. This mode looks somewhat more promising and useful for LF users. We'll have to see how it goes. Here's hoping... Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rik Strobbe To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 8:24 PM Subject: LF: RE: WSQ Frequencies? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.20.0.133 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fbdd513523001863775249cfaf215eac Subject: LF: Re: RE: WSQ Frequencies? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002F_01CF2833.D3CCEF20" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01CF2833.D3CCEF20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks to all. This mode looks somewhat more promising and useful for LF = users. We'll have to see how it goes. Here's hoping... Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rik Strobbe=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 8:24 PM Subject: LF: RE: WSQ Frequencies? Hi Chris, just a suggestion for 472kHz: 474.2kHz dial in USB (as for JT9 and = WSPR). That will put WSQ just below the JT9 segment. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Chris = [c.ashby435@btinternet.com] Verzonden: woensdag 12 februari 2014 21:02 Aan: RSGB LF Group Onderwerp: LF: WSQ Frequencies? Hi All LF, Anybody know what frequencies on 472kHz and 137kHz band to monitor for = anybody trying the WSQ mode? Thanks, 73, Chris, G4AYT. ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01CF2833.D3CCEF20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks to all. This mode looks somewhat = more=20 promising and useful for LF users. We'll have to see how it goes. Here's = hoping...
Vy 73,
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Rik Strobbe
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, = 2014 8:24=20 PM
Subject: LF: RE: WSQ = Frequencies?

Hi Chris,

 

just a suggestion for 472kHz: 474.2kHz dial in USB (as for JT9 and = WSPR).=20 That will put WSQ just below the JT9 segment.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 


Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org=20 [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Chris=20 [c.ashby435@btinternet.com]
Verzonden: woensdag 12 februari = 2014=20 21:02
Aan: RSGB LF Group
Onderwerp: LF: WSQ=20 Frequencies?

Hi All LF,
Anybody know what frequencies on = 472kHz and=20 137kHz band to monitor for anybody trying the WSQ mode?
Thanks, 73, Chris,=20 G4AYT.
------=_NextPart_000_002F_01CF2833.D3CCEF20--