Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <CDA4A61EFF8F4573B356C732F3E36645@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <5A89E1B93EBF49B791182A36A4A894E4@F6CNI> <532096C0.7040901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <98FEB6687E7643A7B7B48F1E1E52F842@Clemens0811>
In-Reply-To: <98FEB6687E7643A7B7B48F1E1E52F842@Clemens0811>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:46:21 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's CW signal on MW
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYq8RWt-A4o

:- ,)

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Clemens Paul" <cpaul@gmx.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 6:27 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Cc: <rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk>
Subject: LF: DK7FC's CW signal on MW

> Hello Stefan,
>
> I do hope that your ugly cw signal will not jam nearly the whole 1kHz 
> segment
> from 472kHz to 473kHz next weekend as last sunday evening.
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36274675/DK7FC_chirpy.png
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36274675/DK7FC.png
> Your sideband noise/click spectrum destroyed my qso with DJ6CB when his 
> signal went below S6 by qsb.
> It would be a good idea to clean up your CW signal a lot or if you're not 
> capable do do this
> reduce your power by at least 10dB,then you would be probably closer to 1W 
> ERP than now..
> BTW on sunday evening I heard you mocking ERP regulations in a qso, so you 
> seem not
> to care much about them.
> I'm not sure if this is helpful for our MW allocation and
> "you can't work them if you can't hear them".
> There are examples how a big AND clean signal can look like,e.g. from 
> DK1IS
> (sorry no screenshot).
> Also DF5QG's signal is much cleaner than yours even if not optimum.
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36274675/DF5QG.png
> You could also move to the upper end near 479kHz where you don't disturb 
> the reception of
> other weak cw signals?
> You seem a bit to behave on MW like you where alone.
>
> 73
> Clemens
> DL4RAJ
>
>
>
>
>
>