Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp36675igc;
        Sun, 15 Dec 2013 06:16:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.180.206.138 with SMTP id lo10mr9615368wic.25.1387116994850;
        Sun, 15 Dec 2013 06:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b3si2281411wix.85.2013.12.15.06.16.34
        for <daveyxm@virginmedia.com>;
        Sun, 15 Dec 2013 06:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1VsC4Y-0001Nm-Mk
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:49:30 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1VsC4Y-0001Nd-9G
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:49:30 +0000
Received: from cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.7])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <pa1sdb@amsat.org>)
	id 1VsC4W-0006Xd-9f
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:49:29 +0000
Received: from cpsps-ews16.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.197]) by cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514);
	 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:49:26 +0100
Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.7]) by cpsps-ews16.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514);
	 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:49:26 +0100
Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514);
	 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:49:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CD7750A063CB4CC5ABBC89362B2EF298@Extensa>
From: "PA1SDB, Peter" <pa1sdb@amsat.org>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <memo.20131214174329.4172A@Jodan.cix.co.uk> <A5B9A6028D404EC395FF75DD994B48B2@White> <52ACA468.8070907@gmx.de> <00a101cef8fe$a1854350$6402a8c0@pa3fnyb8313412> <52ACB684.4040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52AD2C90.4070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
In-Reply-To: <52AD2C90.4070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:49:25 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Dec 2013 13:49:27.0024 (UTC) FILETIME=[78623700:01CEF99C]
X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Stefan, Signal is O.K., but stabillity is'nt :-( To much spread
    around center frequency. (I know.... I'm complaining about 0.01 Hz drift)
    73's Peter [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [213.75.39.7 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120
Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 
	autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 2149

Stefan,
Signal is O.K., but stabillity is'nt :-(
To much spread around center frequency.

(I know.... I'm complaining about 0.01 Hz drift..........)

73's Peter


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; "Paul" <paul@abelian.netcom.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:14 AM
Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC


Since 4:10 UTC, the signal is available without interruptions now on
8.97000500 kHz.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 14.12.2013 20:50, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
> Hi all,
>
> Tomorrow the rain probability is just 10% and so i think i can risk to run a short VLF experiment on 8970.00500 Hz. I'm using the 
> fixed antenna at JN49IK00WD. These days, the QRN is very low for quite a long time! The plan is to run about 500W RF power, or 
> more, depending on the voltage limit of the antenna. And the plan is to start transmitting tonite, after the experiment with 
> VO1NA, i.e. i'll come on air arround 2 UTC, hopefully. I will run the test until the late afternoon. First i'm TXing a stable 
> frequency until 9 UTC, later some DFCW-600, and then maybe some tests in OPDS32.
> Suggestions welcome.
> BUT it all depends on the WX. If it starts to rain then i have to stop.
> Will someone give it a try and watch for me?
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC