Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp392830igc; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:08:40 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.15.93.203 with SMTP id w51mr267034eez.33.1392163720319; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:08:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t5si35124971eeo.211.2014.02.11.16.08.39 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:08:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WDN5v-0003GU-SG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:50:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WDN5v-0003GL-9l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:50:27 +0000 Received: from omr-m07.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.81]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WDN5t-0006FN-1D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:50:26 +0000 Received: from mtaout-mcd01.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mcd01.mx.aol.com [172.26.223.205]) by omr-m07.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 8FCFB70035454 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:50:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from White (95-91-237-152-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.152]) by mtaout-mcd01.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id A58543800009F for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:50:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <52FA6028.90105@broadpark.no> <52FA60C8.8010009@broadpark.no> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FCE58C3@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <52FA813D.2070705@broadpark.no> <824FD7B5B55444A78C9C6D049732D1D7@White> <066601cf2774$7c856400$75902c00$@de> <8A8C13314F274FCB8A6E00763D70EDFE@White> <52FAAD1A.4070900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <06a101cf2782$ffa8ad70$fefa0850$@de> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:50:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1392162621; bh=lPtg71MNPwlPacxYaBTqDyqGLaBwZ7i3k+/2SoHU4SU=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LZOg01q9VrQg/q0DUt15yWK+Wm1fSF2iJX3DNkXusJbL/v7O0mrsdxT76k1LvKpEx l1Ul5+1w2UiJLNVufCtafEPjcpZbjLH743aiisRE0xuwYzqAF6n1OIxQNjzqjEnDEC HXM6BNkkEKXmq/9lzAOuwEmdWcO7Iq+xTa29WrN8= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1adfcd52fab73a7946 X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.152 X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Joe for trying. I think WSQ just needs a noise blanker against the spherics. Now inserted SpecLab's noise blanker feeding VAC and WSQ and the waterfall looks much more steady. Unfortunately this was only after your last transmission... [...] Content analysis details: (0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [64.12.143.81 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 7507df09b4e78494d20ab2aec3aa67b8 Subject: Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01CF278C.644DD1C0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CF278C.644DD1C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Joe for trying. I think WSQ just needs a noise blanker against the spherics. Now = inserted SpecLab's noise blanker feeding VAC and WSQ and the waterfall = looks much more steady. Unfortunately this was only after your last = transmission... Best 73, Markus From: Joe=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:42 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: AW: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF Markus, Stefan. =20 I stopped the TX now. Lets try again this evening, may be a little = earlier. =20 Thats what I got: =20 =20 =20 Good night 73 Joe =20 Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] Im Auftrag von Markus Vester Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2014 00:25 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF =20 Stefan, Joe,=20 =20 best I got so far: ...cq cq c.she df2jp df2jp df\jp ar ... =20 Just tried it: in varicode, sending DF6NM takes about twice as long as = df6nm. =20 73, Markus =20 From: schaefer=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:07 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF =20 That what i get here:=20 df2jp t t t j d|6nm pse k =7F=ADkdfszdqpopcp b q t c e c|\i o ee\jo = df3jo bq k=ADnujnrqf=ADdf2jp df2jp de df6nm df6nm ur mm mm=20 73, Stefan Am 12.02.2014 00:00, schrieb Markus Vester:=20 Joe, =20 ...sq cq cqqode df20r c9cjp d... ...qnrcq mvqee dds'jp df2jpyk f2jp ar... =20 I may have picked up some of your call but it seems to be torn up by = statics (and perhaps DCF39). SNR peaked up to -25. Let's try a little = more... =20 73, Markus =20 =20 From: Joe=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:59 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: AW: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF =20 Hi Markus, LF =20 First decode here but strong qsb =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CF278C.644DD1C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Joe for trying.
 
I think WSQ just needs a noise blanker = against the=20 spherics. Now inserted SpecLab's noise blanker feeding VAC and = WSQ and=20 the waterfall looks much more steady. Unfortunately this was only after = your=20 last transmission...
 
Best 73,
Markus
 
 

From: Joe
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:42 AM
Subject: AW: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for=20 LF/MF

Markus,=20 Stefan.

 

I=20 stopped the TX now. Lets try again this evening, may be a little=20 earlier.

 

Thats=20 what I got:

 

 

 

Good=20 night

73=20 Joe

 

Von:=20 owner-rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org=20 [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] Im Auftrag von Markus = Vester
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2014 = 00:25
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff:=20 Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for=20 LF/MF

 

Stefan, = Joe,=20

 

best I got = so far:=20 ...cq cq c.she df2jp df2jp df\jp ar ...

 

Just tried = it: in=20 varicode, sending DF6NM takes about twice as long as=20 df6nm.

 

73,=20 Markus

 

From: schaefer=20

Sent: = Wednesday, February=20 12, 2014 12:07 AM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20

Subject: Re: LF: = RE: WSQ,A=20 Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF

 

That what i get here:

df2jp t t t j d|6nm = pse k=20 =7F­kdfszdqpopcp  b q t  c e c|\i o ee\jo df3jo bq =20 k­nujnrqf­df2jp  df2jp  de df6nm df6nm ur mm mm =

73,=20 Stefan

Am 12.02.2014 00:00, schrieb Markus Vester: =

Joe,

 

...sq cq = cqqode df20r=20 c9cjp d...

...qnrcq = mvqee dds'jp=20 df2jpyk f2jp ar...

 

I = may have=20 picked up some of your call but it seems to be torn up by statics = (and=20 perhaps DCF39). SNR peaked up to -25. Let's try a little=20 more...

 

73,=20 Markus

 

 

From: Joe

Sent: Tuesday, = February=20 11, 2014 10:59 PM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20

Subject: AW: LF: = RE: WSQ,A=20 Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF

 

Hi=20 Markus, LF

 

First=20 decode here but strong qsb

 

------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CF278C.644DD1C0--