Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-mj01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8079938000087;
Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:20:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1Tr87T-000404-6d
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:19:35 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1Tr87S-0003zv-Qm
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:19:34 +0000
Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk)
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>)
id 1Tr87R-0000Nm-7i
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:19:33 +0000
Received: from AGB ([2.26.8.5])
by mwinf5d11 with ME
id jqKC1k00H06WpAS03qKC2s; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:19:12 +0100
Message-ID: <C914AF93D49D4D98BEC1AC97ADB4A5C9@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <0A4D88A68FCB4F22A2BC40825788A6AA@AGB> <1357150913.48886.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <63C5AFAA6F8C41A7936F2069D38FAC01@AGB> <81FED2F455C94E45B3BE41353A6D53BC@W1KW> <52B2628757094925BA8206A2C0D9640B@AGB> <1357173044.69099.YahooMailNeo@web133203.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <48BBF8CC892E4164B0E96E856BB44972@gnat> <37574910F8F849779F4C4E819B1A999E@AGB> <50E6DE56.8060100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
In-Reply-To: <50E6DE56.8060100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:19:12 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: ..... That's a lot of work for only 1 watt erp why no just
use a resistive matching network ? G )) From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 1:51 PM To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? [...]
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d
Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b9550e6e53f369d
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
..... That's a lot of work for only 1 watt erp why no just use a
resistive matching network ?
G ))
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 1:51 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?
> Horray, 38 new emails since yesterday 20 UTC :-)
> Almost like in the old VLF times ;-)
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
> PS: Finally got my drive enigine (3.5 turns per minute at 6 VDC) to remote
> control the variometer for MF. New things to do...
>