Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2138 invoked from network); 15 May 2000 10:38:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 15 May 2000 10:38:43 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12rI8F-0003kQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 May 2000 11:29:51 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mail2.hamilton-standard.com ([153.4.57.12]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12rI8D-0003kI-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 May 2000 11:29:50 +0100 Received: from curly.hsd.utc.com by mail2.hamilton-standard.com; (8.9.1/) id GAA01876; Mon, 15 May 2000 06:40:54 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from umrsvr.hsd.utc.com by curly.hsd.utc.com; (8.9.0/) id GAA08205; Mon, 15 May 2000 06:28:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nmex01nt.hsd.utc.com by umrsvr.hsd.utc.com; (8.9.0/) id GAA14351; Mon, 15 May 2000 06:10:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by NMEX01NT with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 15 May 2000 12:17:13 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Soegiono, Gamal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: AW: Optimal width for LF? Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 12:17:06 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hello Petr, OK1FIG PM> Can we make a PM> little questionnaire here? PM> What bandwidth do you use and PM> what is the experience? exclusively using aural method for copying signals below 150 kHz here. While in search mode I use 300 Hz For listening to one station I prefer 200 Hz. The also present 50 Hz BW is (to my opinion) too "ringy" to be convenient. No signals met yet which I can hear with 50 Hz but cannot copy as well using 200 Hz. 73 de Gamal