Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13407 invoked from network); 1 Nov 1999 13:19:17 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 1 Nov 1999 13:19:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 18333 invoked from network); 1 Nov 1999 13:27:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 1 Nov 1999 13:27:50 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11iGxa-0002oS-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Nov 1999 12:53:18 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mail2.hamilton-standard.com ([153.4.57.12]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11iGxY-0002oN-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Nov 1999 12:53:16 +0000 Received: from curly.hsd.utc.com by mail2.hamilton-standard.com; (8.9.1/) id IAA11604; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 08:00:45 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from umrsvr.hsd.utc.com by curly.hsd.utc.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/27Feb96-0334PM) id AA10343; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 07:52:04 -0500 Received: from nmex01nt.hsd.utc.com by umrsvr.hsd.utc.com; (8.9.0/) id HAA18437; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 07:49:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by nmex01nt.hsd.utc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:50:17 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Soegiono, Gamal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: AW: Fs measurements Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:50:16 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Dear Vaino, saw your interesting daytime FS figures in the reflector. VL> Fs in dB(uV/m), Det: AVE (except for Alphas) VL> RX: R&S ESH2 (Bw=200 Hz) VL> Ant: Active loop VL> VL> 128.9 DCF49 40 VL> 138.8 DCF39 25 (weak!) Why is the Mainflingen Transmitter DCF49 received 15 dB more strongly than the Burg Transmitter DCF39? Mainflingen should be about 350 km farer from your QTH as compared with Mainflingen. Are these FS values spot measurements, or do they constitute averages over a period of time? In case of spot measurements - this may explain for the differences. Another possibility is, that EFR temporarily uses lower power for DCF39 for some reason. According to their statement the nominal transmitter power for both stations is 50 kW. Best 73 de Gamal