Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v3FDDOAi023584 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 15:13:25 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1czNRy-0005oQ-24 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:09:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1czNRw-0005oH-M7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:09:12 +0100 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1czNRr-0005VQ-1I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:09:11 +0100 Received: from AGB ([95.150.163.2]) by mwinf5d68 with ME id 8d961v00403Qyhb03d96So; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 15:09:06 +0200 X-ME-Helo: AGB X-ME-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 15:09:06 +0200 X-ME-IP: 95.150.163.2 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <33CE58375F0E485AA41770E0C8552335@AGB> <21C25792F3E84B2CA4CA3AEBCB7D4011@AGB> <71a26ccf-2a24-26d0-9a7e-aa1485ab1630@n1bug.com> <6E4F585DCCD348E9B106EF92AB646B4A@AGB> <4b309ff5-66c9-10e4-48d9-b158fb68bf06@n1bug.com> <23614AF081F74E93AFA191172DEE0E33@AGB> In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:09:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170415-0, 15/04/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Signature: 47a967f57bae6380aac0a0062beb1b4e Subject: Re: LF: 136 OP32 LAST 24HR Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11314 Ok Paul The data is from the EA data base , which seems to time stamp + 2 hours gmt , Opera reports gmt The psk-map has developed a sense of hummer in its old age , opera uploads to the map , but what happens to the data after that is not too clear .. Yes , qrm is a problem as with any data system its s/n that determines the final ability to decode .. but to date there's very little data on TA path conditions , other than observation's , being single pass and presenting s/n level , average over the tx period , the results can be compared , directly to events . 73-G, These are the sql ? data base search strings for the psk-map , just change the calls and paste to web browser , downloads a excel data base file Just set the parameter senderCallsign=xxxxx rather than receiverCallsign=xxxxx callsign=xxxxx does both send and receive reports http://pskreporter.info/cgi-bin/pskdata.pl?days=7&receiverCallsign=G0nbd http://pskreporter.info/cgi-bin/pskdata.pl?days=7&senderCallsign=WG2XRS -------------------------------------------------- From: "N1BUG" Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 1:51 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: 136 OP32 LAST 24HR > Yes Graham, > > Down to one spot last night. > > I'm a bit confused though (my usual state). > > The decode last night occurred at 00:55 but your info shows 02:50. Why or > how does that happen? This is not the first time I have noted time > differences. > > Once again my spot last night did not appear on PSKreporter. I guess > that's a PSKreporter or internet issue, not something wrong on my end > since they do sometimes appear... ? > > Is there any place other than PSKreporter where I can check to see if my > spots are going out to the world ? > > I can make a guess why only one spot last night. It was relatively quiet > at the time but in the hour following the spot, QRN background level rose > more than 10 dB. > > 73 Paul > > > > On 04/15/2017 08:32 AM, Graham wrote: >> Down to one spot last night Paul ? >> >> ~~ 02:50 looks to be a good slot , strongest yet, but nothing before >> or >> after, change in the space weather may be ? >> >> 73-G, >> >> 2017-04-15 02:55:21 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -36 >> Op32_||||_~36dB >> >> Story so far >> >> >> 2017-04-15 02:55:21 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -36 >> Op32_||||_~36dB 2017-04-14 >> 07:45:23 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -44 Op32__~44dB 2017-04-14 >> 06:55:23 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -37 Op32_||_~37dB >> 2017-04-14 >> 06:05:22 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -39 Op32__~39dB 2017-04-14 >> 05:15:21 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -37 Op32_||_~37dB >> 2017-04-14 >> 03:35:22 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -38 Op32__~38dB 2017-04-14 >> 03:35:21 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -43 Op32__~43dB 2017-04-14 >> 02:45:21 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -38 Op32__~38dB 2017-04-12 >> 06:48:30 DF2JP AA N1BUG FN55MF 0 136 -40 Op32__~40dB >> 2017-04-10 >> 03:05:23 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -44 Op32__~44dB 2017-04-10 >> 02:33:31 DF2JP JO31HH N1BUG FN55MF 5.383 136 -39 Op32__~39dB 2017-04-10 >> 02:05:22 2E0ILY IO82QV N1BUG FN55MF 4.730 136 -41 Op32__~41dB > > > -- > Paul > N1BUG 160m-2m DXCC Honor Roll > WI2XTC 2200m-630m Experimental license > FN55mf ME Piscataquis County > http://www.n1bug.com > http://www.aurorasentry.com > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus