Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp102293igb; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:55:32 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.82.161 with SMTP id j1mr15486581wiy.23.1385938531642; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 14:55:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ed4si12330698wic.43.2013.12.01.14.55.31 for ; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 14:55:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VnFkM-0004NP-EB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:44:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VnFkL-0004N6-UV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:44:13 +0000 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.14]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VnFkJ-0008Jl-N7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:44:12 +0000 Received: from cpsps-ews21.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.187]) by cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:44:11 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.7]) by cpsps-ews21.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:44:11 +0100 Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:44:11 +0100 Message-ID: From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 22:44:08 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2013 22:44:11.0539 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA762E30:01CEEEE6] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to 8970,022 Hz. Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to xx ? Peter, PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.14 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 09c1a181dc7b5fd4ce37590584a561d1 Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1A4D_01CEEEE6.DA2E28B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3470 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_1A4D_01CEEEE6.DA2E28B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to 8970,022 Hz. Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to xx ? Peter, PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ----- Original Message ----- From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Hi Peter, may be the generator was out of control. as told here I had some trouble with it. GL Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 01.12.2013 21:51 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hello Uwe, I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that 8969,996 Hz transmission Saturday (A) and this Sunday transmission (B) on 8970,022 Hz ? There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps the reason is something here localy ????? I did start the PC, and connected a car battery loader at (18h00) front of that bright part befor A I did diconnect the loader (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared to... Later on the signal became bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz. Wondering why the signal befor mark A was better in relation to B Was it you on 8969,996 Hz ? Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB ------=_NextPart_000_1A4D_01CEEEE6.DA2E28B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In my oppinion the signal was buch better on = 8969,996 in=20 relation to 8970,022 Hz.
Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to = xx=20 ?
 
Peter, PA1SDB
 
www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de =
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 = 10:39=20 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz = Report from=20 The Netherlands.

Hi=20 Peter,
may be the generator was out of control. as told here I had = some=20 trouble with it.
GL
Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet:=20 01.12.2013 21:51
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff:=20 Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

Hello Uwe,
I'm wondering what was/is = the=20 difference between that 8969,996 Hz = transmission Saturday (A)=20 and this Sunday transmission (B) on 8970,022 Hz ?
 
There where some = unstabillity's here=20 localy, so perhaps the reason is something here localy = ?????
 
I did start the PC, and = connected=20 a car battery loader at (18h00) front of that bright part = befor=20 A
I did diconnect the loader=20 (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared to...
Later on the signal = became bright=20 and clear at 8970,022 Hz.
 
Wondering why the = signal befor=20 mark A was better in relation to=20 B 
 
Was it you on 8969,996 Hz=20 ?
 
3D""=20 
 
Best 73's, Peter = PA1SDB
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_1A4D_01CEEEE6.DA2E28B0--