Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9OEHS6F019112 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 16:17:31 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e6zun-0007IW-UC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:10:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e6zug-0007IN-BJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:10:38 +0100 Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net ([2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e6zud-00074T-1y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:10:37 +0100 Received: from resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.104]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id 6zuReqscQcXxQ6zuYeXfLD; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:10:30 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1508854230; bh=OaGb/qchqnBm617WClXRyzlfJ6Ajt4Ssu2ocN2kYJO8=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=nKGFg41+dn6S8bfgm1uGJXiCTZaFWXALAwDgI7CwfOXhI2zZRtt4FB9D264Ab+18k HgMezixIAJVkCVubzw8TPdlAs1Tv8rt7tbH+M7J7rQ+HYIReGIBub4RgUq7/vQu5yg ai45xFlX5Np2oe5uC2bTRZaGuQ6gNRX7igs4f7YYoFha73jx5HG1OrlGO9fIkyef5b IZ7krtPErSZmvJxOxGBNfoeYwmPMmd5beRjEnZS9IlqsIbR32wAXorz51QXFWvO0Pu B6YjueTN6VyBmdP3GDQ0pbbokxbFm8m6iDeldRyCGXCzE2y9DViScqTXyIf0AJlizl Wz6X5qjatCEQA== Received: from DELL4 ([73.4.253.141]) by resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 6zuWevZdoDs016zuXeWOTM; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:10:30 +0000 Message-ID: From: To: References: <46184300.20171024141617@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:10:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFPuDywTpXNKktMsRv0fnfYZTyTjhj7Ox1mynoC/f/EPakBSqfaQExmiUu5mVkKK2Rqw3c8ff9oAOZ/saFUfM7mFkHFF/w0h8ho6Nfc2nHOQUoYY4HRp 60zgWaQGbTnW/wcJBFveQCeWgrV/4hNjAr4rkDKKa5jT/HXzzj4SF97W X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The problem can also be on the receive station end ... i.e. not using an isolation transformer between receiver and sound card input if ground loops are present. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Wilson" To: "dhchurch" Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 9:16 AM Subject: Re: LF: MF/160 [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 47a967f57bae6380aac0a0062beb1b4e Subject: Re: LF: MF/160 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="gb2312"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false The problem can also be on the receive station end ... i.e. not using an isolation transformer between receiver and sound card input if ground loops are present. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Wilson" To: "dhchurch" Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 9:16 AM Subject: Re: LF: MF/160 Hello Hugh, I am assuming the regular transmission you refer to is mine Hugh? In case you or anyone else here thinks I have ignored your multi frequency reports, I have not. I have, in recent weeks, used a G0MRF amp, a G3YXM and my W1VD amp, all of which have their own dedicated LPF assemblies. I have used U3S exciter, and used my Kenwood TS-590 as well. I have used each of them on a SMPS, two high end commercial linear supplies, and on a bank of car batteries, and have tried two different matching transformer arrangements and two different loading coils. You still see multiple TX frequencies from me, only their level changes, which is expected as the amps have different power capabilities. I also have SA screen shots from an in calibration HP8568B analyser which shows sidebands to be well down and no real spurious emissions. So, I feel have gone the extra mile in time and cost to address this and short of moving I am at a loss to as to what more I can do and why you see this, when other very close stations apparently do not, and nothing untoward shows on the G3YXM grabber which isn't that far away from me. Regards, Chris Wilson Monday, October 23, 2017, 8:07:18 PM, you wrote: > > > Hello Andy > > The idea of using any SMPS in, or near, the shack is somewhat > abhorrent. It is possible to introduce a series circuit in a linear > PSU which is not exactly a regulator but has a hum cancellation > circuit, something that used to appear in an ancient National > Semiconductor publication. I'd love to try it but just haven't left > any room in my PSUs, they're stuffed full, including a cooling fan. > A couple of 100Hz side bands are at least predictable, my PA has, > but there is one regular transmission on LF which has all manner of > spurii making reception here somewhat variable. > > I think Dave, GW8GLO, has a system which promptly knocks off his > transmitter SMPS when going into Rx mode, maybe this is the way to go. > > 73, Hugh, M0DSZ > > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > From: Andy Talbot > Receiver: rsgb_lf_group > Time: 2017-10-23, 10:12:17 > Subject: Re: Re: LF: MF/160 > > > > > Its a difficult call - I have a similar problem with my 700 Watt > 137kHz Tx.   30dB hum sidebands corresponds to 3% ripple, which in > the main scheme of things is not that much.   It would need an > enormous reservoir capacitor to make a serious reduction.   > > Either that or design the Tx to run from 50V and use a SMPSU instead of raw rectified AC > > > Andy  G4JNT > > On 23 October 2017 at 10:03, dhchurch wrote: > > > > Mal, I think a little attention should be paid to, perhaps, your > power supply. The 100Hz sidebands, as I recall from earlier > this week, should be much lower in level. Seen on Spectrum > Lab at one stage, they were less than -30dB in comparative level.  >   > 73, Hugh, M0DSZ -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com