Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v09KBtcn022771 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 21:11:57 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cQgAA-0000bE-KR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:03:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cQgA8-0000b5-MT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:03:24 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cQgA1-0005wV-MQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:03:23 +0000 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.208.129.92]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ld1CS-1cquAu04Ei-00iCGm for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 21:03:16 +0100 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <84b6b16b-07c5-3bd1-6598-cf762ff53a7e@tiscali.co.uk> <92D68CDE2AD641949B3D8D91BF91FDEA@PCFMF> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 21:03:14 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdJp4iHu6YyR3ru8Qjiq+DTodBoWagA0GA1w X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OYhGcho/PtPD02SnXOSHLSkPoMi5MbVf2/5LRL8r3wYbH+bMnfK nov07WPiOkWNDCwtNuQ6H3kMGKZzrmSa5Da8iWqaTlUPwnJbQuGTPRUKAZLQjClCG8E0bF5 Q8adf63Tmi+P4BfEPVoN0HBronbriniTt+OQCFS9TxIfmb/LLOzvU4PX9HjKxGU+3psU7Kv ldy/+h2DvNzldBaf+8HDA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:As/qTzBUMPY=:TlN/O7CtoWylTaX+HQqZ8c n/93J+qmP6ftP2de34nvHw+Ej08HGP1S+lPBpu5DZjXniQJF6IYhrX/LcKtItbgK4EyOKSUiD P7F0q/qS2CH0gBBrRyQF+9PF5A+BCQXSmokk9P3S/c7LniKQNl0apE091YAfpZxnWxHG7UPeq FkP1kyFSYKfdLI/SkL+AMJHaLiYKVTv0g+zkZjyL+9H+oacNr842DeUGW1aY8RuAryNLaFuHD UmUKS6i624Y3pAoUPnU3jnQXDX62QtAXLzyCUw5R9wBZz+laYHdlO81mMfb7UoT2FZ4kjAcRb 31LHoyds0etN1X93a3fSlTOwK9dkgAaViNxhImwCggZBWeWA/g6bswAbH2/M0lNBwBAuotUjb OhtgvoF+hrb+Qie/aHhLEX8TlcgBdB61JSTVj9TiCyz/rzkdl/lY+4p3u1mdzzXgfzp0WdLsS a4M4YE5lfrcSPNUfRWQ3ScMG2+w6EJ2OWrE2lwSjTZJuZzG4Wgb37wgzi53Ew5PUZCKDsF6bN YqAFBxTfhAA1xG2de46ua2UvK5dXnsR7BKk14wTK2oCiiywH7NjrEoIAzFUmUSC6Tu9zQB1D1 eaC9jc2MY5sHUkZcu6IjTK2AjFfKHx5eJO7tq2MYcPM7SAnVOTt4xOambDNxe7NPaOdLYdlyb hJszMFmGv1U3CXkCkRXo3bOMTrvp0s6NZhwDSQ3/pIayxIyA1QK1JNUCJHe4WpLl3iX0dLtv7 f2k2HkOhQnFCREeegqCCpk4ngeEhtfbNuU99DMw6gz9DavggsFmmOtf7Ghdxz8DJDO6KoAV3a 6VUVT/k X-Scan-Signature: ead411ce91f9601ce3974c7575797436 Subject: RE: LF: Icom IC706 on LF/MF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10160 Hi Gary, on DL4YHF's HP you'll find some info about the IC706 (first version,i.e. no MK1 nor Mk2) on 630m. http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/mf/mf.html#IC706_on_MF It would appear that all three versions of the 706 behave quite identical on MW. My 706/Mk2's output signal on MW looks like Wolf's 706 signal on the scope. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Gary - G4WGT >Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2017 8:04 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: Icom IC706 on LF/MF > >Hi Andy, > > > > >OK & thank you for your comments & advice. > >It could quite well be just the Mk2 & G versions, but I will >wait until there has be time for more users to reply. > >I have an cheap option on a Mk1 (although it is not labled as >Mk1), the abvious difference is the Mk1 has not got 70cms. > >I may be able to borrow it & make some tests. > > > > >73, Gary - G4WGT. > > > > > > >On 08/01/2017 18:13, F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB wrote: > > > > Hello Gary. > > Here I am using often my Icom 706 version MK2. > > On 630 m it delivers 1 to 2 Watts output when you set >the minimum power level "L". The PA TX radiator stay a bit >warm but not too much during long transmission as OP8. Do not >try to set an higer output level because the PA may be >becoming very warm.... An amator said that his 706 MK2G can >deliver 20 Watts ??? Perhaps there is some difference between >the 2 versions ? The basic stability is nice for WSPR2, OP8 >and QRSS 3 and 10. But here I installed the OCXO option and >with it I can copy QRSS 120 on LF with no perceptible drift. I >highly recommand to build and add an external 5 poles low pass >filter to have a very nice sinus signal shape. > > On 2200 m the PA stays cold but the output power over >50 Ohms is low, about 5 to 10 mW. Also nice shape signal if >you add an external LPF filter. > > This transceiver is also very sensitive on MF / LF >reception an has also a great advantage : only 1 Hz step using >the VFO ! > > 73 de Andy. > > -----Message d'origine----- > From: Gary - G4WGT > Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2017 2:39 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; >rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > Subject: LF: Icom IC706 on LF/MF > > Hi all, > > I recall some while ago it was mentioned that the Icom >IC706 could > produce a low level of LF & MF on Tx. > > Which version was mentioned or will all IC706 versions >produce output at > these frequencies ? > > Thanks in anticipation, > > 73, Gary G4WGT. > > > > >