Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 564D038000096; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:44:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UCxm3-0004xJ-St for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:43:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UCxm3-0004xA-F8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:43:43 +0000 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UCxm0-0002DK-Qq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:43:42 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.46.177]) by mwinf5d26 with ME id 7vjK1l0083pMz2S03vjKha; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:43:20 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <58DDEF66BD1F4FCDA781E159BB3130D4@GaryAsus> <5133BADE.9070906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5133C67A.10300@psk31.plus.com> <5133C9E6.5070406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5133D161.4080703@psk31.plus.com> <5134A7AB.6020202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5134F966.5090807@psk31.plus.com> <5135D5E8.7040304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5135FDDC.2020100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1AD9CFA88EB9476B81C3CD9EE515BB31@PcMinto> <51362618.2040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51364368.3090204@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <51364368.3090204@psk31.plus.com> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:43:19 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Is the shift reversed ? G.. From: g3zjo Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:11 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 8ef270cc2ec30cd34b6313d7ada17a45 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_023D_01CE19D9.B03DF090" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608b51364b28131e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_023D_01CE19D9.B03DF090 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is the shift reversed ? G.. From: g3zjo=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:11 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission Also Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html Wide View, showing your signal. Eddie On 05/03/2013 17:06, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote:=20 Minto,=20 I'm excited. Was that you a few minutes ago?=20 I was writing in real time some stuff to my program which sent the = stuff in RTTY immediately. The TX was in idle mode during that time. = suddenly someone answered! "big brother is watching you" and so. Was = that you?? It looks like my PA is blown up once again. It is simply not designed = for a key-down transmission, so the idle mode is not ideal, except i'm = using a fan. Now i will once again replace 2x IRFZ48N and be on air in 1 = hour or earlier. Let us try the QSO then again, OK? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_023D_01CE19D9.B03DF090 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is the  shift  reversed ?
 
G..

From: g3zjo
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test = transmission

Also Grabber http://www.g3zjo.ta= lktalk.net/lfgrabber.html

Wide=20 View, showing your signal.

Eddie

On 05/03/2013 17:06, = Stefan=20 Sch=C3=A4fer wrote:=20
Minto,=20

I'm excited. Was that you a few minutes ago?
I was writing = in real=20 time some stuff to my program which sent the stuff in RTTY = immediately. The TX=20 was in idle mode during that time. suddenly someone answered! "big = brother is=20 watching you" and so. Was that you??
It looks like my PA is blown = up once=20 again. It is simply not designed for a key-down transmission, so the = idle mode=20 is not ideal, except i'm using a fan. Now i will once again replace 2x = IRFZ48N=20 and be on air in 1 hour or earlier. Let us try the QSO then again, OK? = :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

------=_NextPart_000_023D_01CE19D9.B03DF090--