Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mi06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mi06.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.164]) by air-dc07.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDC071-86034ba24c273ce; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:52:07 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mi06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 47D9B38000102; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:52:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NsHzU-0003BZ-04 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:50:32 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NsHzT-0003BQ-8d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:50:31 +0000 Received: from thsmsgxrt11p.thalesgroup.com ([192.54.144.134]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NsHzQ-0005O8-Fp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:50:31 +0000 Received: from thsmsgirt22p.corp.thales (unknown [10.33.231.6]) by thsmsgxrt11p.thalesgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4291A489E23 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:50:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from thsmsgiav13p.corp.thales (10.33.231.33) by thsmsgirt22p.corp.thales (8.5.103) id 4B990CC6001078F1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:50:22 +0100 Received: from (unknown [10.33.231.1]) by thsmsgiav13p.corp.thales with smtp id 1d70_946e_f5fbe25e_32a5_11df_a510_0013725f4d82; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:50:22 +0100 Received: from nodalthc.clb.tcfr.thales (unknown [10.33.8.65]) by thsmsgirt11p.corp.thales (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C1959802F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:50:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by nodalthc.clb.tcfr.thales with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:50:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Jean-Louis.RAULT@fr.thalesgroup.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:50:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: RE: VLF: more RX stns needed Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAC6B2.B9CF7660" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039400cdece4ba24c251544 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAC6B2.B9CF7660 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lieber Stephan=20 =20 I'm one the guys receiving the ZEVS 82 Hz russian transmissions or the 60= Hz US mains line with an home built e-field receiver :o) =20 Should you transmit on 8,9 kHz during a week end, I would be pleased to us= e my car to go to a radioelectrically quiet place for listening to your transmissions. =20 Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen =20 Jean-Louis F6AGR near Paris QRA loc. JN18DQ =20 =20 _____ =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4fer Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:03 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: contact@vlf.it Subject: AW: VLF: more RX stns needed OK Marco, thank you! =20 And do you think that this grabber is well optimised? A professional equipment, such as Paul's? I do not run a own VLF RX, just the TX... ...in the moment. So i don't hav= e really experiance which effort is needed at the RX side.=20 Maybe, a simple wire and some filtering will be not enough! Having a low noise garden for placing the antenna could probably be the half job. But the website looks impressing and so i assume the RXers there know what to do. Would that be a challenge? And what would be the distance to the next interested and well equipped station? Maybe we can get a mail-contact to the RX stn operators? =20 73 :-) =20 Stefan/DK7FC =20 =20 _____ =20 Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org im Auftrag von Marco IK1ODO Gesendet: Mi 17.03.2010 22:12 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: contact@vlf.it Betreff: Re: VLF: more RX stns needed At 21.55 17/03/2010, you wrote: > >Really, more receivers are needed - calibrated receivers that >can return useful measurements. > >Yes, really. And who could be one of those? > >Does one of the italian OMs know more about the website http://www.vlf.it= / ? >There should be many interestets and probably well equipped >stations. And italy is a good distance. The alps may be no problem ;-) >I have seen a RX spectrogram of the 82Hz ELF transmitter there, so >there seem to be people who are really active in RXing... > >Sri, i cannot stop dreaming now. > >73, Stefan Hi Stefan, here we are :-) - Renato IK1QFK owns www.vlf.it and I meet him every working day from 8:45 to 17:45, HI. He is aware of your tests, and already has a grabber running. No problem to add an high detail 9 kHz zoom, I presume. Renato reads in copy, and you may write to him at contact@vlf.it 73 - Marco IK1ODO ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAC6B2.B9CF7660 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: VLF: more RX stns needed
Lieber Stephan
 
I'm one the guys receiving the ZEVS 82 Hz= russian=20 transmissions or the 60 Hz US mains line with an home built e-field= =20 receiver :o)
 
Should you transmit on 8,9 kHz during a= week end, I would=20 be pleased to use my car to go to a radioelectrically quiet place=20 for listening to your transmissions.
 
Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen=
 
Jean-Louis F6AGR
near Paris
QRA loc. JN18DQ
 
 


From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep= .org=20 [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan= =20 Sch=E4fer
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:03 AM
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Cc: contact@vlf.it
Subject:= =20 AW: VLF: more RX stns needed

OK Marco, tha= nk=20 you!
 
And do you think that this gr= abber is=20 well optimised? A professional equipment, such as Paul's?
I do not run a own VLF RX, ju= st the TX...=20 ...in the moment. So i don't have really experiance which effort is need= ed at=20 the RX side.
Maybe, a simple wire and= some=20 filtering will be not enough! Having a low noise garden for placing the= =20 antenna could probably be the half job.
But the website looks impress= ing and so i=20 assume the RXers there know what to do.
Would that be a challenge? An= d what would=20 be the distance to the next interested and well equipped station?=
Maybe we can get a mail-conta= ct to the RX=20 stn operators?
 
73 :-)
 
Stefan/DK7FC
 
 


Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.= org im=20 Auftrag von Marco IK1ODO
Gesendet: Mi 17.03.2010 22:12
A= n:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Cc: contact@vlf.it
Betreff:= =20 Re: VLF: more RX stns needed

At 21.55 17/03/2010, you wrote:
> >Really, mo= re=20 receivers are needed - calibrated receivers that
>can return usefu= l=20 measurements.
>
>Yes, really. And who could be one of=20 those?
>
>Does one of the italian OMs know more about the we= bsite=20 http://www.vlf.it/ ?
>There sho= uld be=20 many interestets and probably well equipped
>stations. And italy= is a=20 good distance. The alps may be no problem ;-)
>I have seen a RX=20 spectrogram of the 82Hz ELF transmitter there, so
>there seem to= be=20 people who are really active in RXing...
>
>Sri, i cannot st= op=20 dreaming now.
>
>73, Stefan

Hi Stefan,

here we= are=20 :-) - Renato IK1QFK owns www.vlf.it and I meet him every
working day= from=20 8:45 to 17:45, HI.
He is aware of your tests, and already has a grabb= er=20 running. No
problem to add an high detail 9 kHz zoom, I presume.
R= enato=20 reads in copy, and you may write to him at contact@vlf.it

73 - Ma= rco=20 IK1ODO


------_=_NextPart_001_01CAC6B2.B9CF7660--