Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dj09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dj09.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.19.187.145]) by air-da03.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDA033-863b4b868af93ab; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:36:41 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dj09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 61443380079DA; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:36:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Nkeob-0004ee-8S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:35:45 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Nkeoa-0004eV-Qk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:35:44 +0000 Received: from thsmsgxrt11p.thalesgroup.com ([192.54.144.134]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NkeoX-0005Yw-Uz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:35:44 +0000 Received: from thsmsgirt21p.corp.thales (unknown [10.33.231.5]) by thsmsgxrt11p.thalesgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F70D489070 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:35:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from thsmsgiav13p.corp.thales (10.33.231.33) by thsmsgirt21p.corp.thales (8.5.103) id 4B0E9ABB00BB5778 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:35:30 +0100 Received: from (unknown [10.33.231.1]) by thsmsgiav13p.corp.thales with smtp id 1d61_a1b0_05e30bf2_221b_11df_a50f_0013725f4d82; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:35:30 +0100 Received: from nodalthc2.clb.tcfr.thales (unknown [10.33.8.66]) by thsmsgirt11p.corp.thales (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DEF59802F for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:35:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by nodalthc2.clb.tcfr.thales with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) id ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:35:30 +0100 Message-ID: From: Jean-Louis.RAULT@fr.thalesgroup.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:35:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: LF: RE: VLF test signals? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAB627.C7D3115E" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039cdbc9d0e4b868af703f5 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAB627.C7D3115E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stephan =20 The two lowest frequencies in use are presently: =20 - 11.904 kHz (RSDN-20 network, a russian navigation VLF system with transmitters located in Novosibirsk, Krasnodar, etc) =20 - 82 Hz (ZEVS system, an ELF transmitter located on the Kola peninsula and dedicated to strategic transmissions with russian nuclear submarines ) =20 I receive both stations here near Paris with an E-field receiver consistin= g of a home-brew receiver fitted with a FET/BJT front end and a 1m long cylinder vertical antenna =20 Regards =20 Jean-Louis F6AGR _____ =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4fer Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:59 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: VLF test signals? Which commercial VLF transmitters can actually be received in the 10kHz range? There is much listed in the web but in times where these transmitte= rs are shut down all this may be already old stuff. Who is receiving in this frequency region and can tell us a frequency and the SNR he is achieving? There are so many OMs who watch the VLF sector and have nothing done with= LF and this group. Perhaps it it an idea to activate/motivate them for some tests, to increase the RXers density. Maybe it is good to compare some RX rprts in that region. But i will rathe= r be active at the transmitters front now ;-) =20 Stefan/DK7FC ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAB627.C7D3115E Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stephan
 
The two lowest frequencies in use are=20 presently:
 
- 11.904 kHz (RSDN-20 network, a russian= navigation VLF=20 system with transmitters located in Novosibirsk, Krasnodar,=20 etc)
 
- 82 Hz (ZEVS system, an ELF transmi= tter located on=20 the Kola peninsula and dedicated to strategic transmissions with russian= nuclear=20 submarines )
 
I receive both stations here near Paris= with an E-field=20 receiver consisting of a home-brew receiver fitted with a FET/BJT fro= nt end=20 and a 1m long cylinder vertical antenna
 
Regards
 
Jean-Louis F6AGR


From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep= .org=20 [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan= =20 Sch=E4fer
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:59 PM
To:= =20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: VLF test=20 signals?

Which commercial VLF transmi= tters can=20 actually be received in the 10kHz range? There is much listed in the web= but=20 in times where these transmitters are shut down all this may be already= old=20 stuff. Who is receiving in this frequency region and can tell us a frequ= ency=20 and the SNR he is achieving? There are so many OMs who watch the VLF sec= tor=20 and have nothing done with LF and this group. Perhaps it it an idea to= =20 activate/motivate them for some tests, to increase the RXers density.
Maybe it is good to compare some RX rprts in that region.= But i=20 will rather be active at the transmitters front now ;-)
 
Stefan/DK7FC
------_=_NextPart_001_01CAB627.C7D3115E--