Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAKIZqdm028031 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:35:58 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gPAnN-0008Je-Ot for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:30:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gPAnK-0008JV-I6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:30:42 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca ([64.59.134.12]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gPAnH-0007jk-8C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:30:41 +0000 Received: from OWNERPC ([24.108.60.123]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id PAnAgH5ejP7x2PAnBg12rk; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:30:36 -0700 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=shaw.ca Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shaw.ca; s=s20180605; t=1542738636; bh=4Zx5xa7nHZTVSD+mHNKOHqda/lnyLRKAluWzSRIErZU=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=V5qdBcpMRwz8QR2Vl7d+hevXVIUjFUlzqBEccEkGlwKlnFXu22vxLLSdS0eMA8jOr XbYTM8EErfhgxHUK53nsI/wfdL6CZajHALNYAH/ZXKpDYhf51mf+Azv71FXJJZUQ/C ohx3oU6U8oXLcq3onhuPwwa+SeKT71mDTFy9Lf4b58lCF1N1zZ+oawRRlzdutjlMLu U8Fceu+qEvbS+SzY7GS0n61rGKHFFMgx9EnsBTqwc7aRKuXFzW3JlXTQWlbnUmdntD itmXPxvmyA3zJwZoZRIrqDG0uhZux/g41/XFpYfmvvK1z8J26EkZHG4LgB0Vio7lnp jn4PKiIzcTXvg== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=X9GD11be c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=02AN2SbtWL/JWAP7bjKH1A==:117 a=02AN2SbtWL/JWAP7bjKH1A==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=QejfARXMAAAA:8 a=eL5lqVd3AAAA:8 a=GC1iwlCj-Blm0QDc3IUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=BC3gsuZa1vz2YJYxs7Nf:22 a=r5fwSD0_7PCr-xOGcPf9:22 Message-ID: From: "Steve" To: References: <1505616786.3121832.1542660969942.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1505616786.3121832.1542660969942@mail.yahoo.com> <9661df0f-67e4-41c6-169c-6b947906af64@n1bug.com> <5BF342AB.2060309@posteo.de> <464d4413-511d-6d10-3f9a-cc4c59b12a0d@n1bug.com> <5BF3BA16.5010008@posteo.de> <7600cf68-d27b-62ba-684b-ae6b95faa3d0@n1bug.com> <456869353.20181120140404@gmail.com> <83712217-09d4-87aa-d8e8-a9a12373a7a1@n1bug.com> <312635724.20181120151059@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:30:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCH4tEhT1XcR/nwnTiaEZj/+bEdVh4ALaCzUzymHKtI0exKNbP+IibDlPt4ZjgjxVA5dj9/eHgRCBgJB3UCmk20Q6WljCk/wpbBT+T82Njk5sSP3h8Nh fh0H5PDyfl5qK9+d1UqNicCaLaxCoq5/Gvu81Pphkp0By4Q8GEobyDDg X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: >.. is it really wise to just replace the ones that check bad? I'm leaning toward replacing all four whenever one or more is dead. Am I being too paranoid? Paul, FWIW, I've blown a number of the 34NB20s over the years, especially when on the 2200m system. I've always just replaced the blown one only and sparked-up as usual with no ill-effects. Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [64.59.134.12 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e09cca6d8e44a91eadbdfb3e1b8aec09 Subject: LF: Re: WSPR-15 last night Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false >.. is it really wise to just replace the ones that check bad? I'm leaning toward replacing all four whenever one or more is dead. Am I being too paranoid? Paul, FWIW, I've blown a number of the 34NB20s over the years, especially when on the 2200m system. I've always just replaced the blown one only and sparked-up as usual with no ill-effects. PS, I was likely one of the callers you missed last night as I rarely move to the CQers frequency which I probably should. Being so quiet here, my waterfall doesn't show any signs of crud and I often forget that others may have picked the 'clean' spot at their end for a good reason. You have made an excellent point. Steve 73 WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://qsl.net/ve7sl/ VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to Nanowaves": http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/