Message-ID: <BE741BE4FDA544FB9A19BF380D8430BB@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <4F2300AD.5848.19639C6@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, <5D84952ECFA0416E9569631652A8CC7A@GaryPC>, <4F231404.5010707@talktalk.net> <4F24012D.24925.8732C7@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F24012D.24925.8732C7@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:29:24 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Opera query
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60584f2406862d92
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


I think last  time  JR documented  anything  it went up in sheet of flames , 
a sort  of  James Cagney , white  heat  moment , but  as of  24.00z  1 Feb 
There  are  7  + special  hf Tx  permits  issued by the  fcc , with the 
intent of slaying  the Spread Spectrum  dragon... after that  normality 
should return..  what ever that  is  !

Call  qrz  link  That's  one of the  ROS  package features .

Changes  119 > 120   added  the  last  hf  bands to  the  list   14/7/5 MHz

I think  2 / 8 mins  would be  better  for  500  , 15  really  is  masking 
rx  reports and the  band  propagation   can  change  in 2  cycles ,  op8 
is  giving good  results  on 136 , but there  is yet to be a real  long haul 
attempt to  prove op32  (or op64)

G..

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 2:07 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Opera query

> Ah, that's interesting. A feature completely hidden by the fact that
> the software does not alter the cursor when it hovers over the
> clickable link, unlike the convention for most Windows software.
>
> Thanks to all for your help. I can't help thinking that all of this
> discussion would have been unnecessary if the software was properly
> documented. I am now using Op 1.2.0. and I have no idea what, if
> anything, is different from 1.1.9.
>
> Mike, G3XDV
> ==========
>
>
>> Yes but click on a Call Sign in the interweb list and all is revealed.
>>
>> Eddie
>>
>> On 27/01/2012 21:02, Gary G4WGT wrote:
>> > Mike,
>> >
>> > I presume because it only relates to the beam heading at your
>> > station. Showing it on other reports is meaningless to you.
>> >
>> > Gary.
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dennison"
>> > <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
>> > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>> > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:47 PM
>> > Subject: Re: LF: Re: Opera query
>> >
>> >
>> >> OK, Gary, but why don't I see it on anyone else's reports?
>> >>
>> >> MIke
>> >> ====
>> >>
>> >>> That is beam heading.
>> >>>
>> >>> 73, Gary - G4WGT.
>> >>>
>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dennison"
>> >>> <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
>> >>> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>> >>> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 7:53 PM
>> >>> Subject: LF: Opera query
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> > Can any of the Opera experts here tell me why my distance report
>> >>> > has an apparently spurius "@:nnn" where 'nnn' is a number from
>> >>> > 001 to about 500. The number is different for different stations
>> >>> > received, but stays the same each time that station is heard.
>> >>> > The left hand side of the screen looks like:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 19:00 136 M0DTS Op8 -28dB 305km @ 347
>> >>> >
>> >>> > and the right hand side (the web report) repeats this before my
>> >>> > location.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > This appeared when I upgraded to Op 1.1.7 and is still there
>> >>> > with Op 1.1.9.:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Any thoughts?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Mike, G3XDV
>> >>> > ==========
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
>