Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A224E38000088; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:18:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tt5pb-0000Ej-2J for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:17:15 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tt5pa-0000EZ-DM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:17:14 +0000 Received: from nm2-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.108.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt5pY-0000uP-7x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:17:13 +0000 Received: from [212.82.108.229] by nm2.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jan 2013 00:16:51 -0000 Received: from [77.238.189.18] by tm2.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jan 2013 00:16:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jan 2013 00:16:51 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1357777011; bh=ZUk40SMcvOw1o+XQLzy7bRFXQjoItm9AokIhZNf423I=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=WdNgWRkGzVNLo4nttxDcxUlz9FgwjJjBERi06QvEbiJzhXubiESCkgnQ2KWJIAmaEza/009CfkVTU5YrZmvgkD2IRjZZI9y4sBH7u7Req3tXwcg5+ACiRqpJ1HSIgdsFBc1fPz6DU1xEUCG1VwRmMqOI7lR3T18jNcDOAINGTt8= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 462681.28867.bm@smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 8p1hfhwVM1kv0hXgE6lyiWh6Huy_GaZz9NRQcYc4qcRMwYo 3ZFS0zvS_z3YEYJhHZagHJVZI4JEsBP1lsDn_C52qaHHYlrXoK14GSlfQ8ex 8yVqXQZEJmreLKqrsbOOZTFXpH_uJhBHwxJGuxUYOoXghksZ.qFpK4ZpmZRd cwLvTijsgygUwF2jnyQp.JMszUHqIMC9yCWBOzW41t1nTpJ0vm5g4pG3tQ88 ly8Nff7aZ0a3wW0C93S39jC_msTU9tzSJrxSOO21RfRi6.nvot6IuCioJt41 jHeE3YQEuXROrK0LZA10quV0z0PaP.VC3hRGSOUlwa9gjjJbzTWtA07I2iHp phQIdQUp9563KxWZg6WeRuBq0BpriuqntBFPNuhpQKcXyCRlCCORsF1L4vA8 akMwY0mENI2cH3L0CYIRlRh82OQ.Vth_re0.eP5GKfvomBkWa862jIbGxgMF GIKHiH00- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from gnat (alan.melia@81.157.0.154 with login) by smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2013 00:16:51 +0000 UTC Message-ID: From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <1357741041.84828.YahooMailNeo@web133205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <50ED8257.8010001@psk31.plus.com> <1357747491.77414.YahooMailNeo@web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <6DDE45A2DAD5431F88116F9E053ACE5E@gnat> <1357772409.96557.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:09:35 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130109-1, 09/01/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ok Peter it is not a problem, but we try to be responsive to user input :-)) I thought maybe there was a glitch in the set up. Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: M0FMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:00 PM Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.108.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: d7b6e02b91d1bc9fedf732bdb432c3bc Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_013D_01CDEEC6.C5C63910" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_40_50, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mh02.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d650ee08d8628b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_013D_01CDEEC6.C5C63910 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok Peter it is not a problem, but we try to be responsive to user input = :-)) I thought maybe there was a glitch in the set up. Alan ----- Original Message -----=20 From: M0FMT=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:00 PM Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? HI Alan Pete said:----- "I am not complaining its just I wondered why or if there had been a = combining or something." I think that's what I said. I am no longer registered with the Yahoo Group because the Blacksheep = seemed to be just as active and doing everything I need personally. I = think I was expecting too much from the Yahoo. I am sure those using it = are happy. I de-registered because of Yahoo groups overload here and the = temptation to add unwanted superfluous comment was too strong so best I = should disengage. I shot from the hip about the repository because not looked in it = lately for reasons stated above. I am sure it now meets my minimum so I = retract any criticism implied or otherwise unreservedly. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: Alan Melia To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2013, 17:39 Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? Hi Pete that is the first report of any problems with the Yahoo = group, as it is set up virtually the same way as the softrock group I am = keen to know what the difference is. There are not a lot of options = available, the way it deals with attachments is possibly the most = "obvious" and that was set up to the users choice. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: M0FMT=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:04 PM Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? Thanks Eddie I was initially in favour of Yahoo but it seems very "clunky" now = and the repository not so good as I had hoped. At the time I was = modelling it on the Softrock Yahoo group that works very well. However = in attempt to limit the number of groups here I pulled out but went back = the other day for a peek and what did I find my Blacksheep posting. I am = not complaining its just I wondered why or if there had been a combining = or something. Your comments have answered my question and thanks for the advice. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: g3zjo To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2013, 14:44 Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? Good point Pete I tend to post here for sked and comment messages that could be = considered clutter on the Yahoo archive, and Yahoo for monumental = announcements and technical advances of benefit for mankind to be saved = for ever, (well maybe not). However stuff does get replied to on here and also echoed by the = replying station on Yahoo, so what you didn't intend to go to Yahoo = appears there. Also it can happen that a personal reply to someone about = a Blacksheep post can gather some moss and get posted on both = reflectors. Care needed. 73 Eddie On 09/01/2013 14:17, M0FMT wrote:=20 Hi all You have heard the expression "Is there an echo in here?". But = there seems to be one on the Yahoo LF group.... why? 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX =20 ------=_NextPart_000_013D_01CDEEC6.C5C63910 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok Peter it is not a problem, but we = try to be=20 responsive to user input :-)) I thought maybe there was a glitch in = the set=20 up.
 
Alan
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 M0FMT
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, = 2013 11:00=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Why are = threads on here=20 echoed on Yahoo?

HI Alan
 
Pete said:-----
"I am not complaining its just I wondered why or if there = had been=20 a combining or something."
 
I think that's what I said.
 
I am no longer registered with the Yahoo Group because the=20 Blacksheep seemed to be just as active and doing everything I need = personally.=20 I think I was expecting too much from the Yahoo. I am = sure those=20 using it are happy. I de-registered = because of=20 Yahoo groups overload here and the temptation to add unwanted superfluous comment was too strong = so=20 best I should disengage.
  I=20 shot from the hip about the repository=20 because not looked in it lately for reasons stated above. I am sure it = now=20 meets my minimum so I retract any=20 criticism implied or otherwise unreservedly.
 
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: Alan Melia=20 <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
Sent: Wednesday, = 9 January=20 2013, 17:39
Subject: Re:=20 LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo?

Hi Pete that is the first report of = any=20 problems with the Yahoo group, as it is set up virtually the same = way as the=20 softrock group I am keen to know what the difference is. There are = not a lot=20 of options available, the way it deals with attachments is possibly = the most=20 "obvious" and that was set up to the users choice.
 
Alan
G3NYK
 
-----=20 Original Message -----
From:=20 M0FMT =
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.= org=20
Sent:=20 Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:04 PM Subject:=20 Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo?

Thanks Eddie
 
I was initially in = favour of Yahoo=20 but it seems very "clunky" now and the repository not so = good as I=20 had hoped. At the time I was modelling it on the Softrock Yahoo=20 group that works very well. However in attempt to limit the number = of=20 groups here I pulled out but went back the other day for a peek = and what=20 did I find my Blacksheep posting. I am not complaining its just I = wondered=20 why or if there had been a combining or something.
 
Your comments have answered my question and thanks = for the=20 advice.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: g3zjo=20 <g3zjo@psk31.plus.com>
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
Sent: = Wednesday, 9=20 January 2013, 14:44
Subject: Re: LF: Why are = threads on=20 here echoed on Yahoo?

Good point Pete

I tend to post here for sked = and comment=20 messages that could be considered clutter on the Yahoo archive, = and=20 Yahoo for monumental announcements and technical advances of = benefit for=20 mankind to be saved for ever, (well maybe not).

However = stuff=20 does get replied to on here and also echoed by the replying = station on=20 Yahoo, so what you didn't intend to go to Yahoo appears there. = Also it=20 can happen that a personal reply to someone about a Blacksheep = post can=20 gather some moss and  get posted on both = reflectors.

Care=20 needed.

73 Eddie


On 09/01/2013 14:17, M0FMT = wrote:=20
Hi all
 
You have heard the expression "Is there an echo in = here?".=20 But there seems to be one on the Yahoo LF group....=20 why?

73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX



 
<= /DIV>

------=_NextPart_000_013D_01CDEEC6.C5C63910--